Note: You are reading this message either because you do not have a standards-compliant browser, or because you can not see our css files.
Welcome to Yahoo! Fantasy Sports: Skip to Content Skip to Section Navigation
Matchup Ratings
Fantasy matchups for football's top players are rated on a 5-star scale with detailed notes from our experts. Find favored free agents for spot starts and learn which of your starters might be better off on the bench.
Stat Sub Navigation
Matchup |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
Player | Opp | Rating |
Comment |
| (GB - TE)  |
@Det |  |
Put up 5/54 against them earlier this year and a great matchup. |
| (Atl - TE) |
TB | |
Bucs giving up 8th most ppg. to TEs in their last four so start him. |
| (Ind - TE) |
@Hou | |
Caught 14 balls against them earlier this year so you may want to start him. |
| (SF - TE) |
Jac | |
Not a great matchup by the numbers 49ers are going to him down the seem quite frequently. |
| (SD - TE) |
KC | |
Caught 5 balls against them earlier this year and their safeties can be beaten. |
| (Min - TE)  |
Chi |  |
Definitely has potential against vulnerable secondary. |
| (TB - TE) |
@Atl | |
Falcons giving up 6th most ppg. to TEs in their last five. |
| (NO - TE) |
NE | |
Could certainly come through here as Brees throws it 40+ times. |
| (Chi - TE) |
@Min | |
Vikes have been better against the TE lately but he's been a safety valve for Cutler lately. |
| (Pit - TE) |
@Bal |  |
Ravens are solid against the TE and they handled Indy's Clark last week. |
| (Jac - TE) |
@SF | |
Has a chance as 49ers giving up 6/75 against the TE in their last five. |
| (Det - TE) |
GB | |
Drifts in and out of the offense and no Stafford is probably bad news for him but certainly viable. |
| (Was - TE) |
@Phi | |
He did get them for 8/78/1 filling in for the injured Cooley earlier this year. |
| (Sea - TE) |
@StL | |
Huge game against them in Week One with 2 TDs but that was a lifetime ago. |
| (Oak - TE) |
@Dal | |
Gradkowski may actually be great news for him but Dallas has been solid against the TE all year. |
| (NYG - TE) |
@Den | |
Looks really good lately but Broncos are very stingy against the TE. |
| (Phi - TE) |
Was | |
Has been used to block a little more and only put up 3/8 against them earlier this year. |
| (Dal - TE)  |
Oak | |
Looks like a game time decision on Thursday and Raiders are actually stingy against the TE. |
| (Ten - TE) |
Ari |  |
Cardinals do give up TDs to the TE position so he has a chance. |
| (NE - TE) |
@NO | |
Certainly has a chance against banged up secondary giving up 5/57 to the TE per game in their last five. |
| (Ten - TE) |
Ari | |
Seeing the field but Scaife has been more involved. |
| (Buf - TE) |
Mia | |
Dolphins give up 7th most ppg. to the TE in their last five and he does start these days. |
| (Hou - TE) |
Ind | |
Definitely has some juice but Colts are pretty stingy against the TE. |
| (KC - TE) |
@SD | |
He did score last week and Chargers can be shaky against the TE. |
| (Bal - TE) |
Pit | |
He's been MIA lately and Steelers usually pretty good against the TE. |
| (Dal - TE) |
Oak | |
His role could greatly increase this week if TE Witten is out. |
| (NYJ - TE) |
Car | |
Panthers are pretty good against the TE so could come up small. |
| (Den - TE) |
NYG | |
Giants giving up 2nd most ppg. to the TE in their last four but hardly a go-to-guy. |
| (GB - TE) |
@Det |  |
Great matchup but it also is for Finley. |
| (StL - TE) |
Sea | |
You can definitely do better than him. |
| (Cin - RB,TE) |
Cle | |
Not targeted enough to consider. |
| (Mia - TE) |
@Buf | |
Have to check status as he was inactive last week. |
| (Car - TE) |
@NYJ | |
There's literally nothing to get excited about here. |
| (Chi - TE) |
@Min | |
He's been hurt so forget it. |
| (StL - TE) |
Sea | |
He did put up 4/44 against them in Week One if that helps you. |
| (Cle - TE) |
@Cin | |
Very hard to trust and Bengals are pretty solid against the TE. |
| (Phi - TE) NA |
Was |  |
|
| (Car - TE) |
@NYJ | |
|
| (NO - TE) IR |
NE | |
|
| (Ten - TE) |
Ari | |
|
| (NYJ - TE) |
Car | |
|
| (KC - TE) |
@SD | |
|
| (Buf - TE) IR |
Mia | |
|
| (Atl - TE) |
TB | |
|
| (Mia - TE) NA |
@Buf | |
|
| (StL - TE) |
Sea | |
|
| (Cin - TE) IR |
Cle | |
|
| (Ind - TE) |
@Hou | |
|
| (Jac - TE) NA |
@SF | |
|
| (Chi - TE) |
@Min | |
|