Yahoo Sports Fantasy Football

Matchup Recap Summary

Matchup Recap Moderation

Are you sure you want to report this recap? If reported, this recap will not be visible until reviewed by Yahoo Customer Care.

For more information, see Yahoo Help.

Cancel

Week 6

Weekly
Grade
V for ...
4-2 101
84.94
 
VS
proj
Beloglavi
88 1-5
91.69

V for ... defeat Beloglavi, 101-88

V for ... stepped up and outperformed expectations, earning a 101-88 win over Beloglavi, who fell short of projections. Beloglavi grabbed an 11-point lead on Thursday, but V for ... held the lead the rest of the way. They were led by Stefon Diggs (10 Rec, 148 Rec Yds, 1 Rec TD) and JuJu Smith-Schuster (5 Rec, 113 Rec Yds, 1 Rec TD). The Washington Commanders defense (7 Pts Allowed, 392 Yds Allowed, 2 Turnovers) and Ezekiel Elliott (81 Rush Yds, 1 Rush TD) carried the flag for Beloglavi in the loss. V for ... (4-2) will look to rack up another W against Kablarski OVNOVI, while Beloglavi (1-5) will meet Shalabajzeri in an effort to generate some positive momentum.

Matchup Timeline

  V for ...   Beloglavi

Inside the Matchup

Matchup Player of the Week

Taking on the Browns in Week 6, Henry caught 4 passes for 61 yards and a touchdown. In doing so, he put up 12 points to more-than-triple his 3.88-point projection, the third-highest percent increase of any TE in the league this season. In Week 7, Henry and the Patriots will go up against the Bears.
Hunter Henry

Top Player Comparison

V for ...
Points
% of total points 101
1
Stefon Diggs
WR
20
13.14
19.8%
2
JuJu Smith-Schuster
WR
17
6.74
16.8%
3
Saquon Barkley
RB
15
13.62
14.9%
4
Matthew Stafford
QB
14
19.59
13.9%
Beloglavi
Points
% of total points 88
1
The Washington Commanders defense
DEF
15
10.01
17%
2
Ezekiel Elliott
RB
14
8.57
15.9%
3
Miles Sanders
RB
13
10.44
14.8%
4
Aaron Rodgers
QB
13
23.19
14.8%

Matchup Highlights

Sunday Early
Hunter Henry had a 31-yard touchdown catch for V for ..., who trailed 56-40 after the early action.
Sunday Late
JuJu Smith-Schuster had a 42-yard touchdown catch and a 41-yard catch for V for ..., contributing to a 91-56 lead for the team.

Points By Position

  V for ...   Beloglavi

StatSmack

V for ... must have eaten their Wheaties this morning. They scored more in this matchup (101) than their season average (89.17).
We heard scoring helps you win. V for ... are doing a better job of that, averaging 89.17 versus Beloglavi's 80.5.
As Herm Edwards once said, "You play to win the game!" V for ... (4-2) have a better record than Beloglavi (1-5).
You won't win many matchups if you don't play. V for ... has left fewer points on the bench this season (235) than Beloglavi (265).
Once V for ... put their foot on the gas, they don't let up. They've got more blowout wins this season than Beloglavi (1 vs 0).
V for ... are the more resilient squad, with fewer upset losses (0) than Beloglavi (1).
V for ... are clutch masters, with more close wins than Beloglavi (1 vs 0).
V for ... should change their team name to "The Overachievers" since they have scored higher than projected in more matchups than Beloglavi (2 vs 1).
Beloglavi have worked hard with little to show for it, making more transactions (3) than V for ... (0) this week and still losing the matchup.
By position, V for ... have outscored Beloglavi at RB, WR, and TE this season.
V for ... has a higher average scoring margin (3) than Beloglavi this season (-16).
The starters for V for ... had more big plays in their NFL games this week (3) than the starters for Beloglavi (0).
V for ... came out victorious despite having more players on a bye this week (4) than Beloglavi (2).
Hey Beloglavi, want to see stats that favor your team? Well, try winning for a change, and see what the numbers have to say next week!

Coach Talk

V for ...
Hey, finding mismatches is the key to football, right? We really took that to heart this week by doubling up Beloglavi at the wide receiver position (37 points to 18).
Beloglavi
Unless Beloglavi wants to go diva-mode on us, then "not getting many chances" cannot be an excuse this week. As a group, our trio of pass-catchers (two WR and one TE) combined to get a grand total of 26 targets in Week 6. Chemistry appears to be an issue, as that group notched only 15 catches.