New on Yahoo
New on Yahoo
© 2024 All rights reserved.
Yahoo Sports
Yahoo Sports
Note: You are reading this message either because you do not have a standards-compliant browser, or because you can not see our css files.
Welcome to Yahoo Fantasy Sports: Skip to Content Skip to Section Navigation
Matchup Recap Summary
Week 16
Weekly
Grade
Grade
InterHepption
11-4 99.18
115.52
VS
proj
That’s Amari
60.06
8-8
105.64
InterHepption manage to top That’s Amari in 99.18-60.06 runaway
Both teams failed to rise to the occasion, falling short of their projected point totals, but InterHepption did enough to knock off That’s Amari, rolling to a 99.18-60.06 win. That’s Amari earned an 18.26-point lead on Thursday behind an outstanding showing from Trevor Lawrence (229 Pass Yds, 51 Rush Yds, 1 Rush TD). But InterHepption held the lead the rest of the way, powered by Josh Allen, who passed for 172 yards , ran for 41 yards and scored 3 touchdowns for 24.98 points, and Travis Kelce, who caught 6 passes for 113 yards (14.3 points). This marks the second time this season InterHepption have gotten the best of That’s Amari, after winning 104.5-92.4 in their last matchup.
Share
Matchup Timeline
InterHepption
That’s Amari
Inside the Matchup
Matchup Player of the Week
In a 19-16 win over the Cardinals, White scored 13.3 points to beat his 11.5-point projection. He racked up 53 yards from scrimmage and caught a touchdown pass to beat his projection by the highest percentage of any player on InterHepption this week. White will play the Panthers next week.
Rachaad White
Top Player Comparison
InterHepption
Points
% of total points 99.18
1
Josh Allen
QB
24.98
24.07
25.2%
2
Travis Kelce
TE
14.3
16.52
14.4%
3
Rachaad White
RB
13.3
11.5
13.4%
4
Kenneth Walker III
RB
11.5
12.27
11.6%
That’s Amari
Points
% of total points 60.06
1
Trevor Lawrence
QB
18.26
17.3
30.4%
2
A.J. Brown
WR
13.3
14.1
22.1%
3
Dawson Knox
TE
11.3
8.33
18.8%
4
Harrison Butker
K
7
9.96
11.7%
Matchup Highlights
Saturday
There were players with highlight-reel plays on both teams Saturday, but it was InterHepption who owned the lead, 67.28-58.76. For InterHepption, Travis Kelce had a 52-yard catch. A.J. Brown made the highlight reel for That’s Amari with a 48-yard catch.
Points By Position
InterHepption
That’s Amari
StatSmack
They're not even trying that hard. InterHepption have a winning record vs That’s Amari this season despite scoring less against them on average (101.84) than their overall average (114.57).
We heard scoring helps you win. InterHepption are doing a better job of that, averaging 114.57 versus That’s Amari's 98.22.
"Winning isn't everything" was probably said by someone who lost. InterHepption (11-4) have a better record than That’s Amari (8-8).
Even the machines think InterHepption have a better-constructed roster. Their projected average points is higher (117.13) than That’s Amari (104.52).
You won't win many weeks if you leave points on the bench. That’s Amari has left more points on the bench this season (642.36) than InterHepption (586.1).
Once InterHepption put their foot on the gas, they don't let up. They've got more blowout wins this season than That’s Amari (5 vs 2).
InterHepption should change their team name to "The Overachievers" since they have beat their projection in more matchups than That’s Amari (7 vs 4).
By position, InterHepption have outscored That’s Amari at QB, RB, TE, and DEF this season.
InterHepption don’t just win, they win BIG, with an average margin of victory of 8 points, third-highest in the league.
Hey That’s Amari, maybe you'll have better luck next year!
Coach Talk
InterHepption
Hey, finding mismatches is the key to football, right? Fueled by some stellar yardage production from our ball-carriers, our team really made that happen this week. Our three starting backs outgained the RBs of That’s Amari, 172 total yards to 118, as we ultimately doubled up them at the position, 27.2 points to 13.3.
That’s Amari
Unless That’s Amari wants to go diva-mode on us, then "not getting many looks" is not an excuse this week. As a group, our trio of pass-catchers (two WR, one TE) collectively got a hearty 23 targets in Week 16. With only 10 total receptions, this group may need to work on chemistry with their QBs.