Yahoo Sports Fantasy Football

Matchup Recap Summary

Matchup Recap Moderation

Are you sure you want to report this recap? If reported, this recap will not be visible until reviewed by Yahoo Customer Care.

For more information, see Yahoo Help.

Cancel

Week 5

Weekly
Grade
Mountain Climbing Jellyfish
3-2 100.24
113.52
 
VS
proj
Cloud 9 Stonerz
93.96 3-2
119.78

Mountain Climbing Jellyfish top Cloud 9 Stonerz for third straight win, 100.24-93.96

Mountain Climbing Jellyfish extended their win streak to three games with a hard-fought win over Cloud 9 Stonerz, securing a 100.24-93.96 victory. Mountain Climbing Jellyfish jumped out to a 46.44-point lead early Sunday afternoon behind 36.5 points from Mike Williams (10 Rec, 134 Rec Yds) and Saquon Barkley (70 Rush Yds, 1 Rush TD, 36 Rec Yds) and never looked back. Travis Kelce (7 Rec, 25 Rec Yds, 4 Rec TDs) and Amari Cooper (7 Rec, 76 Rec Yds, 1 Rec TD) led the way for Cloud 9 Stonerz in the loss. Mountain Climbing Jellyfish (3-2) will look to keep it rolling against Nasty biters, while Cloud 9 Stonerz (3-2) take on Just Joshin' in an effort to get back on track.

Matchup Timeline

  Mountain Climbing Jellyfish   Cloud 9 Stonerz

Inside the Matchup

Matchup Player of the Week

Against the Browns in Week 5, Williams scored 18.4 points to beat his 12.82-point projection. He caught 10 passes for 134 yards to beat his projection by the highest percentage of any player on Mountain Climbing Jellyfish this week. Next week, Williams will play the Broncos.
Mike Williams

Top Player Comparison

Mountain Climbing Jellyfish
Points
% of total points 100.24
1
Christian McCaffrey
RB
19.9
15.57
19.9%
2
Mike Williams
WR
18.4
12.82
18.4%
3
Saquon Barkley
RB
18.1
15.98
18.1%
4
Trevor Lawrence
QB
12.34
18.35
12.3%
Cloud 9 Stonerz
Points
% of total points 93.96
1
Travis Kelce
TE
30
14.84
31.9%
2
Amari Cooper
WR
17.1
11.19
18.2%
3
Lamar Jackson
QB
15.76
25.07
16.8%
4
Joe Mixon
RB
10.3
15.28
11%

Matchup Highlights

Sunday Early
Saquon Barkley had a 41-yard catch and a 40-yard run for Mountain Climbing Jellyfish, contributing to a 66.14-19.70 lead for the team.

Points By Position

  Mountain Climbing Jellyfish   Cloud 9 Stonerz

What If

Mountain Climbing Jellyfish would have beaten only two other teams besides Cloud 9 Stonerz this week.
Cloud 9 Stonerz would have lost to six other teams besides Mountain Climbing Jellyfish this week.
If Mountain Climbing Jellyfish played Cloud 9 Stonerz every week this season, they'd be 2-3.
Last week, Mountain Climbing Jellyfish would have been victorious over Cloud 9 Stonerz 170.38-94.86.
Mountain Climbing Jellyfish would be 1-3 if they played the same schedule (excluding head-to-head matchups) as Cloud 9 Stonerz.
If they played the same schedule (excluding head-to-head matchups) as Mountain Climbing Jellyfish, Cloud 9 Stonerz would be 2-2.
If Mountain Climbing Jellyfish had played every team in the league each week, they would be 18-27.
If they played every team every week, Cloud 9 Stonerz would be 24-21.

Next Week Preview

Mountain Climbing Jellyfish
In a battle of teams sporting identical 3-2 records, Mountain Climbing Jellyfish and Nasty biters will each aim for their fourth win next week in an early-season showdown. One streak is destined to end, as Mountain Climbing Jellyfish has tallied three straight wins while Nasty biters has won two in a row. Mountain Climbing Jellyfish may have to shuffle the deck some with T.J. Hockenson out on bye next week. Nasty biters will be without Hunter Renfrow. Over the last three weeks, Mountain Climbing Jellyfish have scored 124.63 points per game, while Nasty biters have averaged only 94.07 per contest.
Cloud 9 Stonerz
The upcoming schedule gets no simpler for fourth-place Cloud 9 Stonerz, because they next get to face off against first-place Just Joshin' in Week 6. Five weeks into the 2022 season, Cloud 9 Stonerz have scored the sixth-most points in the league while Just Joshin' (121.83 PPG) are ranked first. Over the last three weeks, Cloud 9 Stonerz has put up 103.85 points per game, while Just Joshin' has averaged 118.26 per contest.