Yahoo Sports Fantasy Football

Matchup Recap Summary

Matchup Recap Moderation

Are you sure you want to report this recap? If reported, this recap will not be visible until reviewed by Yahoo Customer Care.

For more information, see Yahoo Help.

Cancel

Week 3

Weekly
Grade
Chester Rat's
1-2 105.18
120.47
 
VS
proj
Green Bay Packers 1
85.4 1-2
101.01

Chester Rat's fall short of projections, come back to knock off Green Bay Packers 1, 105.18-85.40

Both teams failed to rise to the occasion, falling short of projections, but Chester Rat's did enough to beat Green Bay Packers 1, staging a comeback to earn a 105.18-85.40 victory. After trailing 85.40-76.48 heading into Monday night, Chester Rat's roared back behind CeeDee Lamb, who caught 8 passes for 87 yards and a touchdown for 18.7 points, and the Dallas Cowboys defense, who allowed 16 points, surrendered 336 yards, and intercepted a pass (10 points). Amari Cooper (19.6 points) and Aaron Rodgers (17.1) did everything they could for Green Bay Packers 1 in the loss. Chester Rat's (1-2) will look to maintain their momentum against Arkansas Razorbacks, while Green Bay Packers 1 (1-2) will attempt to develop some positive momentum against Tiderrrrrr's Crazy Team.

Matchup Timeline

  Chester Rat's   Green Bay Packers 1

Inside the Matchup

Matchup Player of the Week

Prater made all 4 of his FG attempts as the Cardinals lost to the Rams 20-12. In doing so, he put up 14 points and scored 63.7% higher than his scoring projection, the highest percentage of any player on Chester Rat's this week. In Week 4, Prater and the Cardinals will go up against the Panthers.
Matt Prater

Top Player Comparison

Chester Rat's
Points
% of total points 105.18
1
CeeDee Lamb
WR
18.7
12.52
17.8%
2
Matt Prater
K
14
8.55
13.3%
3
Justin Herbert
QB
13.58
24.67
12.9%
4
Michael Pittman Jr.
WR
11.2
13.28
10.6%
Green Bay Packers 1
Points
% of total points 85.4
1
Amari Cooper
WR
19.6
10.91
23%
2
Aaron Rodgers
QB
17.1
17.41
20%
3
Najee Harris
RB
11.6
12.79
13.6%
4
The Green Bay Packers defense
DEF
11
5.49
12.9%

Matchup Highlights

Sunday Early
Justin Tucker had a 56-yard field goal for Green Bay Packers 1, helping the team to a 49.20-21.70 lead.
Sunday Late
There were players with standout plays on both teams on Sunday afternoon, but after all the plays were accounted for, Green Bay Packers 1 owned an 85.40-66.08 lead. For Chester Rat's, Justin Herbert had a 54-yard pass and a 45-yard pass. Aaron Rodgers made the highlight reel for Green Bay Packers 1 with a 40-yard pass.

Points By Position

  Chester Rat's   Green Bay Packers 1

StatSmack

That pregame pep talk must have worked. Chester Rat's scored more points in this one (105.18) than their season average (99.27).
We heard scoring helps you win. Green Bay Packers 1 need some help then, averaging just 89.59 versus Chester Rat's's 99.27.
Even the machines think Chester Rat's have a better-constructed roster. They have a higher projected points average (118.48) than Green Bay Packers 1 (108.54).
You can't win if you don't play. Green Bay Packers 1 has left more points on the bench this season (236.9) than Chester Rat's (174.48).
By position, Chester Rat's have outscored Green Bay Packers 1 at QB, WR, and DEF this season.
Hey Green Bay Packers 1, want to see stats that favor your team? Well, try winning for a change, and see what the numbers have to say next week!

Next Week Preview

Green Bay Packers 1
A pair of squads with identical 1-2 records, seventh-place Green Bay Packers 1 are set to square off against ninth-place Tiderrrrrr's Crazy Team next week. Green Bay Packers 1 are ranked eighth in scoring through three weeks (89.59 points per game), while Tiderrrrrr's Crazy Team own the league's lowest point total.
Chester Rat's
In a matchup featuring a pair of teams within a game of each other in the standings, Chester Rat's (1-2) are set to take on Arkansas Razorbacks (2-1) in Week 4. Three weeks into the 2022 campaign, Chester Rat's have scored the fifth-most points in the league while Arkansas Razorbacks (and their 92.12 points per game) are ranked sixth.