Matchup Recap Summary

Matchup Recap Moderation

Are you sure you want to report this recap? If reported, this recap will not be visible until reviewed by Yahoo Customer Care.

For more information, see Yahoo Help.

Week 6

Weekly
Grade
šŸˆGridiron & Wine šŸ·
4-2 142.4
162.56
 
VS
proj
Breeceā€™s Pieces
116 2-4
130.21

šŸˆGridiron & Wine šŸ· beat Breeceā€™s Pieces for fourth straight win in 142.4-116.0 blowout

šŸˆGridiron & Wine šŸ· extended their win streak to four games with a dominant victory over Breeceā€™s Pieces, rolling to a 142.4-116.0 win. It was the third loss in a row for Breeceā€™s Pieces. šŸˆGridiron & Wine šŸ· got out to a 16.9-point lead early Sunday afternoon behind Lamar Jackson (22.1 points) and Joe Mixon (19.8) and never let it go. Rhamondre Stevenson (24.1 points) and Breece Hall (24.1) led the charge for Breeceā€™s Pieces in the loss. šŸˆGridiron & Wine šŸ· improve to 4-2 on the season, while Breeceā€™s Pieces fall to 2-4.

Matchup Timeline

  šŸˆGridiron & Wine šŸ·   Breeceā€™s Pieces

Inside the Matchup

Matchup Player of the Week

In a 20-18 loss to the Steelers, Succop scored 14 points to beat his 8.66-point projection. He made all 4 of his FG attempts to beat his projection by the highest percentage of any player on šŸˆGridiron & Wine šŸ· this week. Next week, Succop will go up against the Panthers.
Ryan Succop

Top Player Comparison

šŸˆGridiron & Wine šŸ·
Points
% of total points 142.4
1
Lamar Jackson
QB
22.1
30.8
15.5%
2
Christian McCaffrey
RB
21.8
18.44
15.3%
3
Joe Mixon
RB
19.8
19.64
13.9%
4
Alvin Kamara
RB
16.4
17.08
11.5%
Breeceā€™s Pieces
Points
% of total points 116
1
Rhamondre Stevenson
RB
24.1
17.88
20.8%
2
Breece Hall
RB
24.1
15.63
20.8%
3
Kirk Cousins
QB
20.5
23.51
17.7%
4
Darrell Henderson Jr.
RB
14.2
16.92
12.2%

Matchup Highlights

Sunday Early
Both teams had players with big-time moments early Sunday, after which šŸˆGridiron & Wine šŸ· had a 108.9-92.0 lead. For šŸˆGridiron & Wine šŸ·, Ryan Succop had a 54-yard field goal. Rhamondre Stevenson had a 31-yard touchdown run for Breeceā€™s Pieces, while Breece Hall had a 34-yard touchdown run.
Sunday Late
Christian McCaffrey had a 49-yard catch for šŸˆGridiron & Wine šŸ· to contribute to a 140.7-116.0 lead for the team.

Points By Position

  šŸˆGridiron & Wine šŸ·   Breeceā€™s Pieces

StatSmack

Get on their level! Breeceā€™s Pieces have lost their last three matchups, while šŸˆGridiron & Wine šŸ· have won four straight.
We heard scoring helps you win. Breeceā€™s Pieces need some help then, averaging just 131.03 versus šŸˆGridiron & Wine šŸ·'s 146.16.
As Herm Edwards once said, "You play to win the game!" šŸˆGridiron & Wine šŸ· (4-2) have a better record than Breeceā€™s Pieces (2-4).
Even the computers think šŸˆGridiron & Wine šŸ· have better players. They have a higher projected points average (159.34) than Breeceā€™s Pieces (133.35).
You won't win many matchups if you don't play. Breeceā€™s Pieces has left more points on the bench this season (216) than šŸˆGridiron & Wine šŸ· (190.96).
Once šŸˆGridiron & Wine šŸ· put their foot on the gas, they don't let up. They've got more blowout wins this season than Breeceā€™s Pieces (3 vs 0).
By position, šŸˆGridiron & Wine šŸ· have outscored Breeceā€™s Pieces at QB, RB, TE, K, and DEF this season.
šŸˆGridiron & Wine šŸ· has a higher average scoring margin (9) than Breeceā€™s Pieces this season (-7).
Don't worry Breeceā€™s Pieces, just because you lost doesn't mean it's all over. But you really should have won. Give that a whirl next week!

Coach Talk

šŸˆGridiron & Wine šŸ·
Nice job, šŸˆGridiron & Wine šŸ·. Bravo on assembling a starting crew that blew the opposition out by over 26 points in Week 6. Let's keep this momentum going as we move on to our Week 7 matchup.
Breeceā€™s Pieces
Unless Breeceā€™s Pieces wants to go diva-mode on us, then "not getting many looks" is definitely not a reasonable excuse this week. As a group, our pass-catching corps (four WR, one TE) collectively received a grand total of 29 targets in Week 6. With just 14 total receptions, that group may need to work on chemistry with their QBs.