They weren't even trying all that hard. Goldmine π£π°π£ scored fewer points in this one (102.26) than their season average of 121.85.
We heard scoring helps you win. Goldmine π£π°π£ are doing a better job of that, averaging 121.85 versus Pitts of Mt Doom's 110.04.
As Herm Edwards once said, "You play to win the game!" Goldmine π£π°π£ (4-4) have a better record than Pitts of Mt Doom (2-6).
Goldmine π£π°π£ don't let their opponents come within striking distance. They've got more blowout wins this season than Pitts of Mt Doom (2 vs 1).
Goldmine π£π°π£ laugh in the face of danger. They've got more upset wins this season (2) than Pitts of Mt Doom (0).
Goldmine π£π°π£ have the clutch gene, with more close wins than Pitts of Mt Doom (1 vs 0).
Goldmine π£π°π£ have started more fantasy players who beat their projection than Pitts of Mt Doom (33 vs 27).
Well, thereβs one stat in favor of Pitts of Mt Doom - theyβve made more transactions (6) than Goldmine π£π°π£ (4) this week. Too bad that itchy pickup finger didn't pay off.
By position, Goldmine π£π°π£ have outscored Pitts of Mt Doom at RB, WR, and K this season.
Goldmine π£π°π£ has a higher average scoring margin (5) than Pitts of Mt Doom this season (-12).
Goldmine π£π°π£ came out victorious even though they had more players on a bye this week (2) than Pitts of Mt Doom (0).
Don't worry Pitts of Mt Doom, just because you lost doesn't mean it's all over. But you really should have won. Give that a whirl next week!