Matchup Recap Summary

Matchup Recap Moderation

Are you sure you want to report this recap? If reported, this recap will not be visible until reviewed by Yahoo Customer Care.

For more information, see Yahoo Help.

Week 12

Weekly
Grade
Sea Wolves
9-2-1 100.18
122.1
 
VS
proj
#33
78.98 4-7-1
93.1

Sea Wolves defeat #33 for sixth straight win, 100.18-78.98

Sea Wolves extended their win streak to six games with a hard-fought victory over #33, earning a 100.18-78.98 win. Sea Wolves never trailed in this one after grabbing an 11.00-point lead on Thursday behind T.J. Hockenson. Russell Wilson (19.48 points) and Davante Adams (14.4) led the charge for #33 in the loss. This marks the first time this season Sea Wolves have beaten #33, after tying 94.42-94.42 in their last matchup. Sea Wolves (9-2-1) will look to keep it rolling against CrunchBunch 38G, while #33 (4-7-1) attempt to get back in the win column against ethan hunt.

Matchup Timeline

  Sea Wolves   #33

Inside the Matchup

Matchup Player of the Week

In a 36-13 win over the Titans, the Patriots defense scored 14 points to beat their 9.21-point projection. They allowed only 13 points, surrendered 355 yards, and forced 4 turnovers to beat their projection by the highest percentage of any player on Sea Wolves this week. The Patriots will play the Bills next week.
The New England Patriots defense

Top Player Comparison

Sea Wolves
Points
% of total points 100.18
1
Matthew Stafford
QB
22.98
21.16
22.9%
2
Austin Ekeler
RB
18.9
17.71
18.9%
3
The New England Patriots defense
DEF
14
9.21
14%
4
Keenan Allen
WR
12
14.22
12%
#33
Points
% of total points 78.98
1
Russell Wilson
QB
19.48
20.42
24.7%
2
Davante Adams
WR
14.4
18.63
18.2%
3
Jarvis Landry
WR
12.1
10.41
15.3%
4
Pat Freiermuth
TE
12
8.18
15.2%

Matchup Highlights

Sunday Late
There were players with highlight-reel plays on both teams on Sunday afternoon, after which Sea Wolves became the proud owner of an 88.18-36.30 lead. For Sea Wolves, Matthew Stafford had a 79-yard touchdown pass and a 54-yard touchdown pass. Davante Adams made the highlight reel for #33 with a 43-yard catch.
Monday
Russell Wilson teamed up with Tyler Lockett for a 55-yard pass for #33. Wilson also lit up the scoreboard with a 32-yard touchdown pass.

Points By Position

  Sea Wolves   #33

StatSmack

You're not even getting their "A" game. Sea Wolves have a winning record vs #33 this season despite scoring less against them on average (97.3) than their overall average (116.89).
Sea Wolves are on a roll, winning six in a row.
We heard scoring helps you win. Sea Wolves are doing a better job of that, averaging 116.89 versus #33's 92.59.
As Herm Edwards once said, "You play to win the game!" Sea Wolves (9-2-1) have a better record than #33 (4-7-1).
Even the machines think Sea Wolves have a better lineup. They have a higher projected points average (121.28) than #33 (107.18).
Sea Wolves don't let their opponents come within striking distance. They've got more blowout wins this season than #33 (4 vs 0).
Sea Wolves are better at closing games out, with fewer close losses than #33 (0 vs 1).
Sea Wolves should change their team name to "The Overachievers" since they have scored higher than projected in more matchups than #33 (5 vs 3).
Sea Wolves have started more fantasy players who beat their projected score than #33 (49 vs 37).
By position, Sea Wolves have outscored #33 at QB, RB, TE, and DEF this season.
Sea Wolves don’t just win, they win BIG, with an average margin of victory of 14 points, highest in the league.
Time to rest the starters for Sea Wolves. They've clinched a playoff spot while #33 are currently on the outside looking in.
Don't worry #33, just because you lost doesn't mean it's all over. But you really should have won. Give that a whirl next week!

Coach Talk

Sea Wolves
Spotting mismatches is a big key to success in football. We made that a point of emphasis by tripling #33 at running back this past week (23.8 points to 7.9).
#33
Luckily, this week's problem was pretty easy to diagnose, #33. Going with Matt Prater in a tough fantasy matchup... let's attempt to play with a full deck of cards next time.