Yahoo Sports Fantasy Football

Matchup Recap Summary

Matchup Recap Moderation

Are you sure you want to report this recap? If reported, this recap will not be visible until reviewed by Yahoo Customer Care.

For more information, see Yahoo Help.

Cancel

Week 16

Weekly
Grade
CeeDeez Nutz
11-5 117.38
104.92
 
VS
proj
Cole 5Geasley
78.14 10-6
103.19

CeeDeez Nutz top projections, knock off Cole 5Geasley in 117.38-78.14 beatdown

CeeDeez Nutz beat expectations, cruising to a 117.38-78.14 win over Cole 5Geasley, who fell short of projections. Cole 5Geasley earned a 7.70-point lead on Thursday, but CeeDeez Nutz held the lead the rest of the way. They were led by Joe Mixon, who racked up 135 yards from scrimmage and scored 2 touchdowns for 25.5 points, and Davante Adams, who caught 10 passes for 114 yards and 2 touchdowns (23.4 points). Justin Herbert (336 Pass Yds, 1 Pass TD, 15 Rush Yds) and Stefon Diggs (7 Rec, 85 Rec Yds, 1 Rec TD) did everything they could for Cole 5Geasley in the loss. This marks the second time this season CeeDeez Nutz have gotten the best of Cole 5Geasley, after winning 99.9-95.5 in their last matchup.

Matchup Timeline

  CeeDeez Nutz   Cole 5Geasley

Inside the Matchup

Matchup Player of the Week

Andrews (8 Rec, 125 Rec Yds, 1 Rec TD) scored 18.5 points in a 41-21 lost to the Bengals in Week 16. His scoring output more-than-doubled his 8.84-point projection and was much higher than his 11.04-point season scoring average. Andrews ranks #26 among all fantasy players this season and will face the Rams next week.
Mark Andrews

Top Player Comparison

CeeDeez Nutz
Points
% of total points 117.38
1
Joe Mixon
RB
25.5
12.31
21.7%
2
Davante Adams
WR
23.4
14.49
19.9%
3
Mark Andrews
TE
18.5
8.84
15.8%
4
Tom Brady
QB
14.38
21.83
12.3%
Cole 5Geasley
Points
% of total points 78.14
1
Justin Herbert
QB
18.94
24.22
24.2%
2
Stefon Diggs
WR
14.5
10.88
18.6%
3
Younghoe Koo
K
11
8.53
14.1%
4
Josh Jacobs
RB
10.4
12.66
13.3%

Matchup Highlights

Sunday Early
There were players with standout moments on both teams early Sunday, after which CeeDeez Nutz owned a 100.98-63.64 lead. Joe Mixon had a 52-yard catch for CeeDeez Nutz, while Tom Brady had a 62-yard pass. Younghoe Koo made the highlight reel for Cole 5Geasley with a 53-yard field goal.
Sunday Late
Brandon McManus had a 55-yard field goal for CeeDeez Nutz to contribute to a 110.98-75.94 lead for the team.

Points By Position

  CeeDeez Nutz   Cole 5Geasley

StatSmack

Cole 5Geasley are down in wins against CeeDeez Nutz this season, with a record of 1-2.
We heard scoring helps you win. CeeDeez Nutz are doing a better job of that, averaging 108.03 versus Cole 5Geasley's 98.16.
You won't win many weeks if you leave points on the bench. CeeDeez Nutz has left fewer points on the bench this season (461.16) than Cole 5Geasley (603.5).
Once CeeDeez Nutz put their foot on the gas, they don't let up. They've got more blowout wins this season than Cole 5Geasley (8 vs 4).
CeeDeez Nutz are clutch masters, with more close wins than Cole 5Geasley (1 vs 0).
CeeDeez Nutz should change their team name to "The Overachievers" since they have scored higher than projected in more weeks than Cole 5Geasley (6 vs 4).
Cole 5Geasley have worked hard with little to show for it, making more transactions (1) than CeeDeez Nutz (0) this week and still losing the matchup.
By position, CeeDeez Nutz have outscored Cole 5Geasley at RB, WR, TE, and DEF this season.
CeeDeez Nutz don’t just win, they win BIG, with an average margin of victory of 14 points, second-highest in the league.
The starters for CeeDeez Nutz had more big plays in their NFL games this week (3) than the starters for Cole 5Geasley (1).
Hey Cole 5Geasley, maybe you'll have better luck next year!

Coach Talk

CeeDeez Nutz
Props to you, CeeDeez Nutz. Putting together a lineup that won by over 39 points in Week 16.
Cole 5Geasley
With just one catch on three measly targets this past week, the starting running backs for Cole 5Geasley clearly should smooth things over with their quarterbacks... and remind them to start checking down more frequently.