Off Constantly fall to A Gurley Has No Name, 142.60-123.14
There's no sugarcoating it, Off Constantly didn't do their job, at least according to projections, as A Gurley Has No Name came from behind to earn a 142.60-123.14 victory. A Gurley Has No Name trailed 123.14-109.90 heading into Sunday night, but the unit charged back behind Ezekiel Elliott, who racked up 127 yards from scrimmage and scored 2 touchdowns for 27.7 points, and Greg Zuerlein, who made 1 of his 2 FG attempts (5 points). Patrick Mahomes (26.44 points) and Dalvin Cook (21.8) led the charge for Off Constantly in the loss. A Gurley Has No Name (1-0) will look to keep it rolling against Smiley Face!, while Off Constantly (0-1) will face Average Joe’s in an effort to get their first win.
Projected to score 8.92 points, the Ravens defense scored 68.2% more than that amount by scoring 15 points in a 38-6 win over the Browns. They allowed only 6 points, surrendered 306 yards, and forced 3 turnovers to beat their projection by the highest percentage of any player on A Gurley Has No Name this week. The Ravens will battle the Texans next week.
The Baltimore Ravens defense
Sunday Early
Both teams had players with standout plays early Sunday, but it was Off Constantly who owned the lead, 123.14-72.30. For A Gurley Has No Name, Julio Jones had a 44-yard catch. DK Metcalf made the highlight reel for Off Constantly with a 38-yard touchdown catch.
Sunday Late
Kyler Murray had a 22-yard touchdown run for A Gurley Has No Name, who trailed 123.14-109.90 after the late round of games.
A Gurley Has No Name
Props to you, A Gurley Has No Name. Nice work deploying a team that won by 19.46 points in Week 1. Let's take this W in stride, tip our cap to the GM of Off Constantly, and continue our march towards the Its Just a Fantasy World X league title.
Off Constantly
Unless Off Constantly wants to go full diva-mode, then "not seeing enough looks" isn't really a reasonable excuse this time around. As a group, our four pass-catchers (three WR, one TE) combined to get a grand total of 36 targets in Week 1. Timing and chemistry appear to be issues as that group tallied only 19 catches.