Matchup Recap Summary

Matchup Recap Moderation

Are you sure you want to report this recap? If reported, this recap will not be visible until reviewed by Yahoo Customer Care.

For more information, see Yahoo Help.

Week 3

Weekly
Grade
Crazed Doggs
2-1 101.83
79.77
 
VS
proj
Fat Samurai
83.65 0-3
92.35

Crazed Doggs hand Fat Samurai third consecutive loss, 101.83-83.65

Crazed Doggs emerged victorious with a 101.83-83.65 victory to hand Fat Samurai their third consecutive loss to open the season. Crazed Doggs nabbed an early 2.95-point lead on Thursday. Fat Samurai came back to take the lead early Sunday, powered by Myles Garrett (18 points) and JuJu Smith-Schuster (10.15). Unphased, Crazed Doggs got it going later that afternoon, as Tyler Lockett (28 points) and Michael Badgley (5) put them back in the lead once and for all. Crazed Doggs (2-1) will look to keep it rolling against Raiders Hell Hounds, while Fat Samurai (0-3) attempt to earn their first victory against Raider4life.

Matchup Timeline

  Crazed Doggs   Fat Samurai

Inside the Matchup

Matchup Player of the Week

Playing the Saints in Week 3, Lazard caught 6 passes for 146 yards and a touchdown. In doing so, he put up 18.2 points to more-than-quadruple his 4.36-point projection, the highest percent increase of any player on Crazed Doggs this week. Lazard will face the Falcons next week.
Allen Lazard

Top Player Comparison

Crazed Doggs
Points
% of total points 101.83
1
Josh Allen
QB
31.58
17.08
31%
2
Tyler Lockett
WR
28
7.23
27.5%
3
Allen Lazard
WR
18.2
4.36
17.9%
4
Myles Jack
LB
8
6.39
7.9%
Fat Samurai
Points
% of total points 83.65
1
Myles Garrett
DE
18
8.88
21.5%
2
Demario Davis
LB
10.25
8.86
12.3%
3
JuJu Smith-Schuster
WR
10.15
6.37
12.1%
4
Jerick McKinnon
RB
9.85
6.55
11.8%

Matchup Highlights

Sunday Early
JuJu Smith-Schuster had a 26-yard touchdown catch for Fat Samurai, contributing to a 67.10-45.53 lead for the team.
Sunday Late
Tyler Lockett had a 43-yard touchdown catch for Crazed Doggs, contributing to an 83.63-69.40 lead for the team.
Sunday Night
Allen Lazard had a 72-yard catch and a 48-yard catch for Crazed Doggs to contribute to a 101.83-79.65 lead for the team.

Points By Position

  Crazed Doggs   Fat Samurai

StatSmack

Crazed Doggs must have eaten their Wheaties this morning. They scored more in this one (101.83) than their season average (88.53).
Fat Samurai would be doing great, if the goal was to lose. They've lost three in a row.
We heard scoring helps you win. Fat Samurai need some help then, averaging just 82.48 versus Crazed Doggs's 88.53.
"Winning isn't everything" was probably said by someone who lost. Crazed Doggs (2-1) have a better record than Fat Samurai (0-3).
You can't win if you leave points on the bench. Fat Samurai has left more points on the bench this season (135.18) than Crazed Doggs (91.32).
Crazed Doggs laugh in the face of danger. They've got more upset wins this season (2) than Fat Samurai (0).
Crazed Doggs should change their team name to "The Overachievers" since they have scored higher than projected in more matchups than Fat Samurai (2 vs 0).
Fat Samurai have worked hard with little to show for it, making more transactions (1) than Crazed Doggs (0) this week and still losing the matchup.
By position, Crazed Doggs have outscored Fat Samurai at QB and RB this season.
Crazed Doggs has a higher average scoring margin (11) than Fat Samurai this season (-33).
The starters for Crazed Doggs had more big plays in their NFL games this week (3) than the starters for Fat Samurai (1).
There's not much good to say about Fat Samurai this week. Maybe they'll get their act together, and we'll see something different next week!

Coach Talk

Crazed Doggs
You know, this sport is all about exploiting the mismatches. Thanks to an awesome performance by Josh Allen, we nearly quadrupled Fat Samurai at the quarterback position this past week (31.58 points to 8.05). Allen went 24-for-33 for 311 yards, four TDs, and an INT in a three-point victory over the Rams.
Fat Samurai
Well, we certainly can't whine about a lack of opportunities this time, can we? As a group, our five pass-catchers (four WR and one TE) were targeted a grand total of 31 times in Week 3. Chemistry seems to be an issue, as that group hauled in only 19 receptions.