Matchup Recap Summary

Matchup Recap Moderation

Are you sure you want to report this recap? If reported, this recap will not be visible until reviewed by Yahoo Customer Care.

For more information, see Yahoo Help.

Week 11

Weekly
Grade
Los Bastardos
7-4 229.3
187.55
 
VS
proj
Who Dat
213.4 8-3
192.57

Back-and-forth battle ends with Los Bastardos coming back to beat Who Dat, 229.3-213.4

Well, that was exciting! After a back-and-forth matchup featuring three lead changes, Los Bastardos earned a come-from-behind win over Who Dat, rallying to earn a 229.3-213.4 victory. Trailing 213.4-203.8 heading into Monday night, Los Bastardos rallied behind Cooper Kupp (11 Rec, 145 Rec Yds). Patrick Mahomes (80.4 points) and Adam Thielen (32.3) did everything they could for Who Dat in the loss. This marks the second time this season Los Bastardos have taken down Who Dat, after winning 176.8-162.6 in their last matchup. Los Bastardos (7-4) will look to maintain their winning ways against Roostrs, while Who Dat (8-3) will face Chiefs Fan in an effort to get some positive momentum.

Matchup Timeline

  Los Bastardos   Who Dat

Inside the Matchup

Matchup Player of the Week

Kupp caught 11 passes for 145 yards as the Rams beat the Buccaneers 27-24. In doing so, he put up 25.5 points to scored 71.1% higher than his 14.9-point projection, the highest percentage of any player on Los Bastardos this week. Kupp will face the 49ers in Week 12.
Cooper Kupp

Top Player Comparison

Los Bastardos
Points
% of total points 229.3
1
Ben Roethlisberger
QB
68.7
63.97
30%
2
Travis Kelce
TE
28.1
19.22
12.3%
3
Cooper Kupp
WR
25.5
14.9
11.1%
4
Dalvin Cook
RB
25
22.26
10.9%
Who Dat
Points
% of total points 213.4
1
Patrick Mahomes
QB
80.4
75.54
37.7%
2
Adam Thielen
WR
32.3
16.44
15.1%
3
The New Orleans Saints defense
DEF
25
10.88
11.7%
4
Diontae Johnson
WR
23.1
16.3
10.8%

Matchup Highlights

Sunday Early
There were players with standout moments for both teams early Sunday, but after the scoring was completed, Los Bastardos boasted a 121.1-86.6 lead. For Los Bastardos, Ben Roethlisberger had a 31-yard touchdown pass and a 20-yard touchdown pass. Younghoe Koo made the highlight reel for Who Dat with a 52-yard field goal and a 51-yard field goal.
Sunday Late
Adam Thielen had a 51-yard catch for Who Dat, who trailed 175.7-133.0 after the late action.
Sunday Night
Both teams had players with big-time plays on Sunday night, but it was Who Dat who took the lead, 213.4-203.8. For Los Bastardos, Travis Kelce had a 22-yard touchdown catch. Patrick Mahomes made the highlight reel for Who Dat with a 22-yard touchdown pass.

Points By Position

  Los Bastardos   Who Dat

StatSmack

There's a pattern emerging. In their two matchup wins against Who Dat, Los Bastardos averaged more points (203.05) than they usually score (188.44).
We heard scoring helps you win. Los Bastardos are doing a better job of that, averaging 188.44 versus Who Dat's 177.14.
Los Bastardos are clutch masters, with more close wins than Who Dat (2 vs 0).
Los Bastardos should change their team name to "The Overachievers" since they have beat their projection in more matchups than Who Dat (7 vs 4).
Los Bastardos have started more fantasy players who beat their projected score than Who Dat (50 vs 41).
Who Dat have worked hard with little to show for it, making more transactions (3) than Los Bastardos (2) this week and still losing the matchup.
By position, Los Bastardos have outscored Who Dat at RB, WR, TE, K, and DEF this season.
Los Bastardos don’t just win, they win BIG, with an average margin of victory of 7 points, third-highest in the league.
Hey Who Dat, want to see stats that favor your team? Well, try winning for a change, and see what the numbers have to say next week!

Coach Talk

Los Bastardos
Nice work this past week, Los Bastardos! Let's give thanks for this bountiful victory, and now focus our attention towards a stiff challenge in Roostrs.
Who Dat
Even though we weren't able to get a victory in Week 11, let's remember that we still have a bounty of fantasy football awesomeness to be thankful for.