Yahoo Sports Fantasy Football

Matchup Recap Summary

Matchup Recap Moderation

Are you sure you want to report this recap? If reported, this recap will not be visible until reviewed by Yahoo Customer Care.

For more information, see Yahoo Help.

Cancel

Week 6

Weekly
Grade
LUCKY DOG 2.0
6-0 115
133.91
 
VS
proj
The Cereal Killers
107 3-3
151.59

LUCKY DOG 2.0 defeat The Cereal Killers to remain undefeated, 115-107

LUCKY DOG 2.0 won their sixth straight to open the season with a hard-fought victory over The Cereal Killers, emerging victorious with a 115-107 win. The Cereal Killers took a 3-point lead early Sunday afternoon, but LUCKY DOG 2.0 held the lead the rest of the way. They were led by Ronald Jones II (113 Rush Yds, 2 Rush TDs) and Chase Claypool (4 Rec, 74 Rec Yds). Patrick Mahomes (225 Pass Yds, 2 Pass TDs, 36 Rush Yds) and Miles Sanders (118 Rush Yds) led the way for The Cereal Killers in the loss. LUCKY DOG 2.0 (6-0) will look to notch another win against Gronkie Kong🦧, while The Cereal Killers (3-3) will try to get back in the win column against OLR.

Matchup Timeline

  LUCKY DOG 2.0   The Cereal Killers

Inside the Matchup

Matchup Player of the Week

Jones II (113 Rush Yds, 2 Rush TDs) scored 28 points in a 38-10 win over the Packers in Week 6. His scoring output was 75.1% more than his 15.99-point projection and was much higher than his 15.67-point season scoring average. Jones II ranks #50 among all fantasy players this season and will face the Raiders next week.
Ronald Jones II

Top Player Comparison

LUCKY DOG 2.0
Points
% of total points 115
1
Ronald Jones II
RB
28
15.99
24.3%
2
Chase Claypool
WR
17
15.59
14.8%
3
Stefon Diggs
WR
16
15.82
13.9%
4
Phillip Lindsay
RB
13
13.13
11.3%
The Cereal Killers
Points
% of total points 107
1
Patrick Mahomes
QB
20
25.34
18.7%
2
Miles Sanders
RB
15
18.09
14%
3
Robert Woods
WR
13
15.09
12.1%
4
Mike Davis
RB
13
17.29
12.1%

Matchup Highlights

Sunday Early
Miles Sanders had a 74-yard run for The Cereal Killers to contribute to a 61-58 lead for the team.

Points By Position

  LUCKY DOG 2.0   The Cereal Killers

StatSmack

They weren't even trying all that hard. LUCKY DOG 2.0 scored fewer points in this one (115) than their season average of 155.17.
LUCKY DOG 2.0 are on a roll, winning six in a row.
We heard scoring helps you win. The Cereal Killers need some help then, averaging just 136 versus LUCKY DOG 2.0's 155.17.
"Winning isn't everything" was probably said by someone who lost. LUCKY DOG 2.0 (6-0) have a better record than The Cereal Killers (3-3).
You won't win many weeks if you leave points on the bench. The Cereal Killers has left more points on the bench this season (462) than LUCKY DOG 2.0 (380).
Once LUCKY DOG 2.0 put their foot on the gas, they don't let up. They've got more blowout wins this season than The Cereal Killers (3 vs 2).
LUCKY DOG 2.0 laugh in the face of danger. They've got more upset wins this season (1) than The Cereal Killers (0).
LUCKY DOG 2.0 should change their team name to "The Overachievers" since they have scored higher than projected in more matchups than The Cereal Killers (4 vs 2).
LUCKY DOG 2.0 have had more fantasy starters beat their projection than The Cereal Killers (35 vs 23).
By position, LUCKY DOG 2.0 have outscored The Cereal Killers at RB, WR, TE, and K this season.
LUCKY DOG 2.0 don’t just win, they win BIG, with an average margin of victory of 26 points, second-highest in the league.
LUCKY DOG 2.0 was able to get the win despite having more players on a bye this week (4) than The Cereal Killers (2).
Hey The Cereal Killers, want to see stats that favor your team? Well, try winning for a change, and see what the numbers have to say next week!

Coach Talk

LUCKY DOG 2.0
You know LUCKY DOG 2.0, I'm a "glass half full" kind of coach. While some may harp on the fact that our scoring output has slipped lately, I'll choose to spin this in a positive direction. Averaging 163.2 points through Week 5, our crew has obviously proven that it's even better than the 115 we needed to win this past week!
The Cereal Killers
The Cereal Killers may find it tough to complain about lack of opportunities this past week. As a group, our four pass-catchers (three WR, one TE) combined to receive a grand total of 29 targets in Week 6. With only 15 total catches, this group may need to work on chemistry with their QBs.