Yahoo Sports Fantasy Football

Matchup Recap Summary

Matchup Recap Moderation

Are you sure you want to report this recap? If reported, this recap will not be visible until reviewed by Yahoo Customer Care.

For more information, see Yahoo Help.

Cancel

Week 14

Weekly
Grade
dave's Standout Team
12-2 78.34
90.19
 
VS
proj
Parks&REC
76.82 5-9
91.84

Offensively challenged dave's Standout Team come back to knock off Parks&REC in 78.34-76.82 battle

dave's Standout Team staged a comeback to earn a 78.34-76.82 win over Parks&REC despite ranking only eighth in the league in points scored for the week. Trailing 76.82-65.84 heading into Sunday night, dave's Standout Team charged back behind Cooper Kupp (4 Rec, 45 Rec Yds, 1 Rec TD). Patrick Mahomes (14.92 points) and Travis Kelce (14.5) led the way for Parks&REC in defeat. This marks the second time this season dave's Standout Team have taken down Parks&REC, after winning 111.52-85.04 in their last matchup. dave's Standout Team (12-2) have now won seven straight and will look to keep it rolling in the playoffs. Parks&REC will be home for the playoffs, finishing the season at 5-9.

Matchup Timeline

  dave's Standout Team   Parks&REC

Inside the Matchup

Matchup Player of the Week

Mixon (146 Rush Yds, 1 Rush TD, 40 Rec Yds) scored 26.1 points in a 27-19 lost to the Browns in Week 14. His scoring output more-than-doubled his 10.52-point projection and was much higher than his 10.89-point season scoring average. Mixon ranks #66 among all fantasy players this season and will face the Patriots next week.
Joe Mixon

Top Player Comparison

dave's Standout Team
Points
% of total points 78.34
1
Joe Mixon
RB
26.1
10.52
33.3%
2
Mike Evans
WR
12.6
14.78
16.1%
3
Cooper Kupp
WR
12.5
13.74
16%
4
Josh Allen
QB
10.74
19.36
13.7%
Parks&REC
Points
% of total points 76.82
1
Patrick Mahomes
QB
14.92
21.33
19.4%
2
Travis Kelce
TE
14.5
12.43
18.9%
3
Harrison Butker
K
13
8.29
16.9%
4
Tyreek Hill
WR
10
15.09
13%

Matchup Highlights

Sunday Early
Mike Evans had a 61-yard touchdown catch for dave's Standout Team, helping the team to a 65.84-9.60 lead.
Sunday Late
Patrick Mahomes had a 48-yard touchdown pass for Parks&REC to contribute to a 76.82-65.84 lead for the team.

Points By Position

  dave's Standout Team   Parks&REC

StatSmack

You're not even getting their "A" game. dave's Standout Team have a winning record vs Parks&REC this season despite scoring less against them on average (94.93) than their overall average (102.11).
Get on their level! dave's Standout Team have won seven straight weeks, while Parks&REC have dropped their last four.
As Herm Edwards once said, "You play to win the game!" dave's Standout Team (12-2) have a better record than Parks&REC (5-9).
Even the computers think dave's Standout Team have better players. Their projected average points is higher (106.89) than Parks&REC (95.06).
In dire times, at least dave's Standout Team keep it close. They've been blown out less times than Parks&REC (1 vs 3).
dave's Standout Team have the clutch gene, with more close wins than Parks&REC (3 vs 0).
By position, dave's Standout Team have outscored Parks&REC at QB, RB, and WR this season.
dave's Standout Team don’t just win, they win BIG, with an average margin of victory of 18 points, second-highest in the league.
dave's Standout Team are in the playoffs. Parks&REC are currently looking forward to next season.
Don't worry Parks&REC, just because you lost doesn't mean it's all over. But you really should have won. Give that a whirl next week!

Coach Talk

dave's Standout Team
You know dave's Standout Team, I'm a "glass half full" kind of coach. While some may harp on the fact that our scoring's slipped lately, I'll choose to spin this in a positive direction. Averaging 103.93 points through Week 13, our crew has obviously proven that it's even stronger than the 78.34 we needed to win this past week!
Parks&REC
Luckily, Week 14's problem isn't exactly rocket science, Parks&REC. Going with Damien Williams and Kerryon Johnson in what was ultimately a tight fantasy matchup... let's just move on from this and assume that something like this won't happen again?