Yahoo Sports Fantasy Football

Matchup Recap Summary

Matchup Recap Moderation

Are you sure you want to report this recap? If reported, this recap will not be visible until reviewed by Yahoo Customer Care.

For more information, see Yahoo Help.

Cancel

Week 10

Weekly
Grade
No Clothes Required
5-5 86.82
100.62
 
VS
proj
The VaGiants 🌟
77.92 1-9
91.78

Offensively challenged No Clothes Required defeat The VaGiants 🌟, 86.82-77.92

No Clothes Required earned an 86.82-77.92 win over The VaGiants 🌟 in spite of ranking only 12th in the league in points scored for the week. No Clothes Required grabbed a 36.5-point lead early Sunday afternoon behind stellar showings from Daniel Jones (30.32 points) and Kenny Golladay (14.7) and never looked back. Baker Mayfield (238 Pass Yds, 2 Pass TDs) and Tarik Cohen (14 Rush Yds, 23 Rec Yds, 1 Rec TD) did their part for The VaGiants 🌟 in the loss. No Clothes Required (5-5) will look to add to their success against Yall Can Suck My Dak, while The VaGiants 🌟 (1-9) attempt to develop some positive momentum against OMGBeckylook@herpunt.

Matchup Timeline

  No Clothes Required   The VaGiants 🌟

Inside the Matchup

Matchup Player of the Week

Playing the Jets in Week 10, Jones passed for 308 yards and 4 touchdowns and ran for 20 yards. In doing so, he put up 30.32 points and scored 72.0% higher than his scoring projection, the fifth-highest percentage of any QB in the league this season. Next week, Jones will square off against the Bears.
Daniel Jones

Top Player Comparison

No Clothes Required
Points
% of total points 86.82
1
Daniel Jones
QB
30.32
17.63
34.9%
2
Kenny Golladay
WR
14.7
12.06
16.9%
3
Cole Beasley
WR
11.4
8.74
13.1%
4
Saquon Barkley
RB
8.1
22.7
9.3%
The VaGiants 🌟
Points
% of total points 77.92
1
Baker Mayfield
QB
17.62
16.66
22.6%
2
Tarik Cohen
RB
13.7
7.44
17.6%
3
Jack Doyle
TE
13.4
8.92
17.2%
4
Jason Myers
K
11
8.26
14.1%

Matchup Highlights

Sunday Early
Daniel Jones had a 61-yard touchdown pass and a 39-yard touchdown pass for No Clothes Required, while Kenny Golladay had a 47-yard touchdown catch to contribute to a 70.52-34.02 lead for No Clothes Required.

Points By Position

  No Clothes Required   The VaGiants 🌟

StatSmack

They weren't even trying all that hard. No Clothes Required scored less in this one (86.82) than their season average of 115.13.
We heard scoring helps you win. The VaGiants 🌟 need some help then, averaging just 78.15 versus No Clothes Required's 115.13.
"Winning isn't everything" was probably said by someone who lost. No Clothes Required (5-5) have a better record than The VaGiants 🌟 (1-9).
Even the machines think No Clothes Required have a better-constructed roster. Their projected average points is higher (118.31) than The VaGiants 🌟 (96.64).
No Clothes Required don't let their opponents come within striking distance. They've got more blowout wins this season than The VaGiants 🌟 (1 vs 0).
No Clothes Required don't falter at the last minute, with fewer close losses than The VaGiants 🌟 (0 vs 1).
No Clothes Required should change their team name to "The Overachievers" since they have scored higher than projected in more weeks than The VaGiants 🌟 (5 vs 3).
No Clothes Required have had more fantasy starters beat their projection than The VaGiants 🌟 (38 vs 30).
The VaGiants 🌟 have worked hard with little to show for it, making more transactions (6) than No Clothes Required (4) this week and still losing the matchup.
By position, No Clothes Required have outscored The VaGiants 🌟 at QB, RB, WR, TE, K, and DEF this season.
The starters for No Clothes Required had more big plays in their NFL games this week (3) than the starters for The VaGiants 🌟 (0).
Hey The VaGiants 🌟, want to see stats that favor your team? Well, try winning for a change, and see what the numbers have to say next week!

Coach Talk

No Clothes Required
Hey, this sport is all about exploiting the mismatches. We really took that to heart this week by doubling up The VaGiants 🌟 at the wide receiver position (31.2 points to 15.2).
The VaGiants 🌟
Unless The VaGiants 🌟 wants to go diva-mode on us, then "not seeing many opportunities" doesn't fly as an excuse this time around. Our four pass-catchers (three WR and one TE) combined to receive a grand total of 20 targets in Week 10. Chemistry appears to be an issue, as that group hauled in only nine balls.