Matchup Recap Summary

Matchup Recap Moderation

Are you sure you want to report this recap? If reported, this recap will not be visible until reviewed by Yahoo Customer Care.

For more information, see Yahoo Help.

Week 9

Weekly
Grade
Cooking with Defense
8-1 235
198.31
 
VS
proj
A Team Has No Name
160.9 8-1
199.17

Cooking with Defense overtake A Team Has No Name for 1st place in 235.0-160.9 rout

Cooking with Defense overtook A Team Has No Name in the standings, ascending to the top of the standings in NJ with a convincing win, rolling to a 235.0-160.9 victory. Cooking with Defense got out to a 23.8-point lead on Thursday behind George Kittle (16.8 points) and Fred Warner (7) and never let go of it. Jared Goff (391 Pass Yds, 3 Pass TDs, 17 Rush Yds) and Tom Brady (294 Pass Yds, 1 Pass TD) were the leaders for A Team Has No Name in defeat. Cooking with Defense (8-1) have now won four straight and will look to notch another W against TeamBrickLesnar. A Team Has No Name (8-1) match up against BeastMode Training in an effort to get back on track.

Matchup Timeline

  Cooking with Defense   A Team Has No Name

Inside the Matchup

Matchup Player of the Week

Taking on the Raiders in Week 9, Kittle caught 4 passes for 108 yards and a touchdown. In doing so, he put up 16.8 points and more-than-doubled his scoring projection, the fifth-highest percent increase of any TE in the league this season. Kittle will play the Giants in Week 10.
George Kittle

Top Player Comparison

Cooking with Defense
Points
% of total points 235
1
Patrick Mahomes
QB
50.8
42.4
21.6%
2
Matt Ryan
QB
49
34.04
20.9%
3
James Conner
RB
22.3
14.54
9.5%
4
Brandin Cooks
WR
17.4
10.02
7.4%
A Team Has No Name
Points
% of total points 160.9
1
Jared Goff
QB
55.34
40.72
34.4%
2
Tom Brady
QB
26.66
44.97
16.6%
3
Todd Gurley II
RB
13.9
21.15
8.6%
4
Roquan Smith
LB
12
6.14
7.5%

Matchup Highlights

Thursday
George Kittle had a 71-yard catch for Cooking with Defense, contributing to a 23.8-0.0 lead for the team.
Sunday Early
Matt Ryan had a 40-yard touchdown pass and a 39-yard touchdown pass for Cooking with Defense, while Patrick Mahomes had a 50-yard touchdown pass and a 40-yard pass to contribute to a 184.3-38.7 lead for Cooking with Defense.
Sunday Late
Both teams had players with highlight-reel moments on Sunday afternoon, after which Cooking with Defense boasted a 214.7-117.7 lead. For Cooking with Defense, Brandin Cooks had a 48-yard catch. Jared Goff made the highlight reel for A Team Has No Name with a 41-yard touchdown pass and a 48-yard pass.
Sunday Night
Tom Brady had a 55-yard touchdown pass for A Team Has No Name, who trailed 214.7-160.9 after Sunday night.

Points By Position

  Cooking with Defense   A Team Has No Name

What If

Cooking with Defense would have beaten every other team in the league this week.
A Team Has No Name would have lost to three other teams besides Cooking with Defense this week.
If they played A Team Has No Name every week, Cooking with Defense would be 5-4 this season.
Last week, Cooking with Defense would have beaten A Team Has No Name 240.24-202.86.
Cooking with Defense would be 7-1 if they played the same schedule (excluding head-to-head matchups) as A Team Has No Name.
If they played the same schedule (excluding head-to-head matchups) as Cooking with Defense, A Team Has No Name would be 7-1.
If Cooking with Defense had played every team in the league each week, they would be 69-12.
If they played every team every week, A Team Has No Name would be 66-15.

Coach Talk

Cooking with Defense
We do appreciate the confidence this past week, Cooking with Defense. It takes moxie to play, not one, but TWO starters with zero points (Brandon Marshall and Calais Campbell), while still getting the W. Try that type of flashy, show-off stuff next week against TeamBrickLesnar and we'll be toast.
A Team Has No Name
So, A Team Has No Name, did your receiving crew drop too many balls in practice or something? Seeing only 11 total targets this past week, our four wide receivers clearly need to get the attention of their respective QBs this week in practice.