Level | Rating | Percentiles | |
---|---|---|---|
![]() |
Diamond | 900+ | 99th |
![]() |
Platinum | 800-899 | 95th-98th |
![]() |
Gold | 700-799 | 81st-94th |
![]() |
Silver | 600-699 | 60th-80th |
![]() |
Bronze | 0-599 | 0-59th |
Fantasy | Rank | Matchup | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pos | Offense | Action | Proj Pts | % Start Trend | Proj | Rating | Comment | |
QB | 17 | 16% (-2) | 21 | Lamar Jackson showed value with his rushing ability again last week when he rushed for 95 yards, but he continued to struggle as a passer by only throwing for 135 yards and a touchdown and in Week 16, the Ravens take on a Chargers defense that gives up the fourth-fewest fantasy points per game to quarterbacks. | ||||
WR | 9 | 86% (-1) | 63 | Robert Woods has posted between 61-78 yards in seven of the Rams' last eight games, and his floor makes him a solid option in Week 16, when he faces an Arizona defense that's allowed just three WRs to top 50 yards over their last five games. | ||||
RB | 7 | 47% (-2) | 85 | Listed as Inactive. | ||||
TE | 4 | 3% (+3) | 202 | Listed as Inactive. | ||||
W/R | 12 | 99% (–) | 41 | Listed as Inactive. | ||||
BN | 10 | 94% (+1) | 53 | Stefon Diggs has five catches or fewer in three straight while being held under 50 yards twice in that span, but has scored four times in the Vikings last six outings entering a Week 16 matchup against an 11th-ranked Lions pass defense that has allowed four 100-yard receivers since Week 10. | ||||
BN | 9 | 69% (-12) | 65 | Listed as Inactive. | ||||
BN | 18 | 8% (+1) | 23 | Marcus Mariota and Tennessee's passing attack took a back seat to the running game for a second straight week, and that might be the formula Week 16 against Washington's 18th-ranked run defense. | ||||
BN | 9 | 82% (-1) | 62 | Listed as Inactive. | ||||
BN | 0 | 7% (-1) | 817 | Listed as Inactive. |
Fantasy | Rank | Matchup | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pos | Kickers | Action | Proj Pts | % Start Trend | Proj | Rating | Comment | |
K | 10 | 44% (+2) | 94 | Listed as Inactive. |
Fantasy | Rank | Matchup | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pos | Defense/Special Teams | Action | Proj Pts | % Start Trend | Proj | Rating | Comment | |
DEF | Indianapolis - DEF
| 9 | 42% (+28) | 112 |
Fantasy | Rank | Matchup | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pos | Defensive Players | Action | Proj Pts | % Start Trend | Proj | Rating | Comment | |
LB | 15 | 42% (+3) | - | Listed as Inactive. | ||||
DT | 6 | 5% (–) | - | Listed as Inactive. | ||||
DE | 6 | 10% (–) | - | |||||
CB | 12 | 11% (-1) | - | Listed as Inactive. | ||||
S | 0 | 22% (-2) | - | Listed as Inactive. |