Level | Rating | Percentiles | |
---|---|---|---|
Diamond | 900+ | 99th | |
Platinum | 800-899 | 95th-98th | |
Gold | 700-799 | 81st-94th | |
Silver | 600-699 | 60th-80th | |
Bronze | 0-599 | 0-59th |
Fantasy | Rank | Matchup | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pos | Offense | Action | Proj Pts | % Start Trend | Proj | Rating | Comment | |
QB | 24.33 | 81% (+4) | 6 | NYJ have given him some problems and give up only 18.1 FP/G last five weeks but he's certainly reliable and on a roll now. | ||||
WR | 7.64 | 44% (+4) | 112 | Charger secondary is pretty solid, but at least it is not a shut down group and he's been their best receiver all season. | ||||
WR | 13.82 | 97% (–) | 27 | He'll see a lot of top corner Davis, so it could be a tough matchup, but you are not sitting him in Week 16. | ||||
RB | 17.35 | 87% (+4) | 17 | A whopping 31 touches last week and the Bengals have been dreadful against RBs the second half of the season. | ||||
RB | 7.81 | 27% (-1) | 107 | Already played in Week 16. | ||||
TE | 7.99 | 70% (-4) | 75 | Obviously we're concerned about Clausen, but the Lions are a great matchup for TEs and give up 16.8 FP/G the last 5 weeks. | ||||
W/R/T | 8.05 | 43% (-3) | 104 | Only 1 target last week, but he did catch 8 balls with 2 TDs against them earlier this year and they stink on the back end giving up 44.1 FP/G to WRs the last 5 weeks. | ||||
BN | 2.73 | 2% (–) | 2554 | Had 8 carries last week, but no reason to reach him given the matchup and QB issues. | ||||
BN | 0.00 | 1% (–) | 2090 | Inactive again last week and a poor reach even if he is active in Week 16. | ||||
BN | 7.08 | 49% (-3) | 91 | Already played in Week 16. |
Fantasy | Rank | Matchup | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pos | Kickers | Action | Proj Pts | % Start Trend | Proj | Rating | Comment | |
K | 9.01 | 18% (–) | 158 | Tough to back a kicker who has 6 attempts, but only 1 FG in his last 2 games. |