Level | Rating | Percentiles | |
---|---|---|---|
Diamond | 900+ | 99th | |
Platinum | 800-899 | 95th-98th | |
Gold | 700-799 | 81st-94th | |
Silver | 600-699 | 60th-80th | |
Bronze | 0-599 | 0-59th |
Fantasy | Rank | Matchup | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pos | Offense | Action | Proj Pts | % Start Trend | Proj | Rating | Comment | |
QB | 16.38 | 28% (+6) | 26 | A very medium matchup as Vikes giving up 20.6 FP/G last five weeks but overall a beatable matchup for the offense. | ||||
WR | 13.04 | 99% (–) | 37 | Poor game last week, but we would not bet against that happening again even with a solid Buc secondary even on the other side. | ||||
WR | 8.14 | 58% (-11) | 103 | Obviously he is not a lock with Manziel and the beatable Panther secondary has been good against WRs lately. | ||||
WR | 8.50 | 50% (-1) | 100 | Texans are giving up a healthy 39.2 FP/G the last 5 weeks, including 14 catches to receivers. | ||||
RB | 15.35 | 87% (+4) | 17 | A whopping 31 touches last week and the Bengals have been dreadful against RBs the second half of the season. | ||||
RB | 14.25 | 78% (+5) | 19 | Disappointing last week and overall lately, but this is a very good matchup as the Falcons give up 26.8 FP/G the last 5 weeks. | ||||
TE | 5.16 | 6% (–) | 134 | Jets have given up plenty of TDs to TE this year, so not a horrible long-shot if desperate. | ||||
BN | 7.21 | 26% (-5) | 128 | Has proven to be a volatile fantasy asset, but he has upside any given week and he had 5 targets last week. | ||||
BN | 0.09 | 30% (-27) | 2665 | Just about a full implosion last week so he's been benched for Clausen. | ||||
BN | 13.53 | 63% (+7) | 29 | Not a large margin for error, but at least the game is home and the matchup isn't scary overall and they stuck with him after he fumbled last week. | ||||
BN | 0.00 | 46% (-26) | 2122 | He is out this week. | ||||
BN | 0.00 | 1% (–) | 2104 | Could be back soonish but no way you can consider him in Week 16. | ||||
BN | 6.85 | 31% (-4) | 94 | RGIII has not helped him at all and the Eagles can be good against the TE, so we'd lower expectations. |
Fantasy | Rank | Matchup | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pos | Kickers | Action | Proj Pts | % Start Trend | Proj | Rating | Comment | |
K | 7.14 | 7% (-1) | 1758 | We'd head for the hills against this defense and with Keenum or Lewis in at QB. |