Level | Rating | Percentiles | |
---|---|---|---|
![]() |
Diamond | 900+ | 99th |
![]() |
Platinum | 800-899 | 95th-98th |
![]() |
Gold | 700-799 | 81st-94th |
![]() |
Silver | 600-699 | 60th-80th |
![]() |
Bronze | 0-599 | 0-59th |
Fantasy | Rank | Matchup | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pos | Offense | Action | Proj Pts | % Start Trend | Proj | Rating | Comment | |
QB | 60 | 7% (+1) | 44 | Not as good of a matchup as some would think as Raiders have been respectable and give up only 19.4 FP/G last five weeks. | ||||
WR | 24 | 99% (–) | 21 | Tougher matchup against a solid secondary and they are running the ball a ton, but all you can do is keep starting him. | ||||
WR | 11 | 9% (+1) | 161 | Already played in Week 16. | ||||
WR | 12 | 31% (+1) | 136 | Did have 7 targets last week, but we would use him only if we needed him as RGIII has shown very few signs of life. | ||||
RB | 7 | 26% (-6) | 144 | Pats giving up just 2.9 YPC to RBs their last 5 games, so he's not looking good on paper. | ||||
RB | 8 | 3% (–) | 141 | A brutal matchup, but he delivered with 17 touches last week in another tough matchup. | ||||
RB | 13 | 22% (+7) | 69 | Already played in Week 16. | ||||
TE | 18 | 97% (–) | 48 | He's averaged 19 points in PPR against them his last 5 games, so you have to keep starting him. | ||||
W/R/T | 16 | 51% (+8) | 92 | Ravens give up 47.5 FP/G the last 5 weeks, but coming off concussion and hard to trust Keenum. | ||||
BN | 5 | 0% (–) | 2407 | |||||
BN | 2 | 3% (+1) | 2595 | |||||
BN | 3 | 8% (–) | 2532 | They have wanted to take a longer look at him, but still only 13 snaps last week with 5 touches. | ||||
BN | 56 | 30% (+8) | 32 | Looks like he's ready to go and it's not a bad matchup. | ||||
BN | 4 | 0% (–) | 2543 | No thanks in Week 16. | ||||
BN | 10 | 5% (–) | 172 | The only thing as bad as the Redskins secondary right now is Cooper's own production, so forget it. | ||||
BN | 0 | 11% (–) | 2439 | |||||
BN | 12 | 4% (+2) | 135 | Did score last week, but had only 2 targets in the game and remains a bad reach. | ||||
BN | 0 | 3% (–) | 2615 | |||||
BN | 9 | 13% (-1) | 127 | He simply can't be trusted, but the Giants have been vulnerable to the TE this year. |
Fantasy | Rank | Matchup | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pos | Kickers | Action | Proj Pts | % Start Trend | Proj | Rating | Comment | |
K | 11 | 78% (-4) | 168 | Only 2 FGs the last 2 weeks, but they could stall in his range on the road against this improved D. | ||||
BN | 12 | 18% (–) | 158 | Tough to back a kicker who has 6 attempts, but only 1 FG in his last 2 games. |
Fantasy | Rank | Matchup | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pos | Defense/Special Teams | Action | Proj Pts | % Start Trend | Proj | Rating | Comment | |
DEF | Cleveland - DEF
| 13 | 22% (–) | 109 | Very up and down and down last week but Panthers do give up 8.8 FP/G last five weeks so have a chance. | |||
BN | San Francisco - DEF
| 9 | 54% (-1) | 233 | SD giving up 7.4 FP/G last five weeks so it's medium matchup but they just lost LB Borland which hurts. |