Level | Rating | Percentiles | |
---|---|---|---|
![]() |
Diamond | 900+ | 99th |
![]() |
Platinum | 800-899 | 95th-98th |
![]() |
Gold | 700-799 | 81st-94th |
![]() |
Silver | 600-699 | 60th-80th |
![]() |
Bronze | 0-599 | 0-59th |
Fantasy | Rank | Matchup | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pos | Offense | Action | Proj Pts | % Start Trend | Proj | Rating | Comment | |
QB | 27.03 | 99% (–) | 1 | Texan defense has been decent against the pass but they're certainly beatable and he won't have any weather issues in this one. | ||||
WR | 9.67 | 89% (-1) | 96 | Hard to sit a man who had 16 targets and had 10/195/1 last week but we can't ignore the presence of CB Jennings who is pretty solid. | ||||
WR | 6.57 | 7% (+2) | 168 | Still more of a reach but he could be rounding back into form after getting a game under his belt last week and put up 5/84/1 against them earlier this year. | ||||
WR | 0.22 | 1% (+1) | 2604 | Actually had 7 targets last week and 4/99 with Cousins in but he's still hard to trust. | ||||
RB | 8.44 | 48% (-3) | 127 | Mathews was injured early in the previous matchup and Woodhead ended up catching all 9 of his targets, yet even with Mathews emerging, a solid play as the Raiders give up the 2nd most FPPG to RBs the last 5 weeks. | ||||
RB | 7.13 | 3% (-1) | 148 | Panthers giving up the 4th most FPPG to RBs the last 5 weeks and he played only 8 snaps last week. | ||||
TE | 3.76 | 8% (+3) | 214 | We can't say he's a lock but he did put up 5/40/1 against them earlier this year and it's the best matchup in the league for a TE, so a very viable reach. | ||||
W/R/T | 7.08 | 27% (+5) | 125 | Very disappointing last week with only 4 targets but he knows this defense very well and he needs another look, as the Pats are giving up the 2nd most FPPG to TEs the last 5 weeks. | ||||
BN | 0.00 | 0% (–) | 2081 | Put up only 1/9 last week on 3 targets. | ||||
BN | 0.00 | 0% (–) | 2281 | |||||
BN | 17.30 | 75% (+33) | 6 | He's in your lineup if he's active on gameday but his status could come down to gametime. | ||||
BN | 2.43 | 0% (–) | 2495 | |||||
BN | 7.24 | 6% (-1) | 121 | |||||
BN | 0.00 | 9% (–) | 1853 | Great matchup and he did score last week, yet he also had just 3 targets on 19 snaps. | ||||
BN | 21.35 | 71% (-2) | 3 | The Bears have actually given up the 3rd fewest FPPG to QBs the last 5 weeks but it's hardly a shut down secondary and his body of work has been extremely impressive. | ||||
BN | 6.13 | 1% (–) | 189 | He was doing some work early in the week, but inactive in Week 11 and the QBB is struggling. |
Fantasy | Rank | Matchup | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pos | Kickers | Action | Proj Pts | % Start Trend | Proj | Rating | Comment | |
K | 6.70 | 68% (+3) | 238 | He continues to be absolute money as he's 6/6 in his last 3 so keep starting him. |
Fantasy | Rank | Matchup | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pos | Defensive Players | Action | Proj Pts | % Start Trend | Proj | Rating | Comment | |
LB | 8.16 | 8% (–) | 543 | |||||
LB | 8.79 | 9% (-1) | 1132 | |||||
LB | 9.37 | 46% (-3) | 892 | |||||
DT | 7.07 | 11% (–) | 593 | |||||
DE | 3.15 | 1% (–) | 590 | |||||
DE | 4.27 | 2% (–) | 699 | |||||
CB | 2.30 | 1% (–) | 1679 | |||||
CB | 3.11 | 0% (–) | 1736 | |||||
S | 12.01 | 12% (+1) | 1466 | |||||
S | 4.38 | 16% (–) | 1368 | |||||
BN | 3.94 | 4% (-1) | 308 | |||||
BN | 5.21 | 0% (–) | 1382 |