Level | Rating | Percentiles | |
---|---|---|---|
![]() |
Diamond | 900+ | 99th |
![]() |
Platinum | 800-899 | 95th-98th |
![]() |
Gold | 700-799 | 81st-94th |
![]() |
Silver | 600-699 | 60th-80th |
![]() |
Bronze | 0-599 | 0-59th |
Fantasy | Rank | Matchup | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pos | Offense | Action | Proj Pts | % Start Trend | Proj | Rating | Comment | |
QB | 21 | 80% (-3) | 9 | Two poor games in a row is a concern but they do tend to play better at home usually and while the Giants haven't been bad against the pass, it's certainly a beatable matchup. | ||||
WR | 12 | 88% (–) | 49 | Only 5 targets last week but he caught all 5 for 72/1 and Philly gives up the 4th most FPPG to WRs the last 5 weeks. | ||||
WR | 11 | 69% (+9) | 93 | At this point he's putting up massive numbers and after 19 targets last week you have to start him, especially in a PPR. | ||||
RB | 18 | 98% (–) | 7 | There's really no comment needed as he posted 60 FP last week and the matchup is great. | ||||
RB | 3 | 44% (+5) | 266 | Disappointed last week with only 11/23 rushing but at least the Rams have been shaky against RBs all year and give up the 9th most FPPG to RBs the last 5 weeks which includes 9 catches per game to RBs. | ||||
TE | 8 | 27% (+5) | 125 | Very disappointing last week with only 4 targets but he knows this defense very well and he needs another look, as the Pats are giving up the 2nd most FPPG to TEs the last 5 weeks. | ||||
W/R | 10 | 54% (+10) | 72 | On a major roll and getting volume and putting up big rushing numbers and the Raiders give up the 2nd most FPPG to RBs the last 5 weeks so you have to start him. | ||||
BN | 6 | 60% (-3) | 140 | He did put up 7/74 against them earlier this year so not a bad play at all if you need him. | ||||
BN | 12 | 33% (-6) | 69 | Not expected to play this week. | ||||
BN | 19 | 28% (+13) | 19 | As long as the INTs don't hurt you, very hard to pass up on this great matchup as the Eagles give up the 7th most FPPG to QBs the last 5 weeks. | ||||
BN | 12 | 16% (-3) | 53 | Did next to nothing against them earlier this year and a very scary matchup plus he's still a bit banged up. |
Fantasy | Rank | Matchup | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pos | Kickers | Action | Proj Pts | % Start Trend | Proj | Rating | Comment | |
K | 7 | 36% (–) | 273 | He's been hanging in there and producing more often than not and there should be plenty scored in this one and the weather is going to be a lot warmer. | ||||
BN | 8 | 62% (–) | 207 | He's 5/5 in his last 3 games so viable but you could probably do better and that's even if Rodgers returns. |
Fantasy | Rank | Matchup | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pos | Defense/Special Teams | Action | Proj Pts | % Start Trend | Proj | Rating | Comment | |
DEF | Buffalo - DEF
| 19 | 30% (-7) | 137 | Getting it done lately for fantasy with 6 sacks and 4 INTs the last 2 weeks but Tannehill, while he has some protection issues, has been borderline brilliant lately. | |||
BN | New England - DEF
| 18 | 62% (-5) | 151 | They've come up pretty small for fantasy so not a great option at all and it's below average by the numbers. |