Level | Rating | Percentiles | |
---|---|---|---|
Diamond | 900+ | 99th | |
Platinum | 800-899 | 95th-98th | |
Gold | 700-799 | 81st-94th | |
Silver | 600-699 | 60th-80th | |
Bronze | 0-599 | 0-59th |
Fantasy | Rank | Matchup | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pos | Offense | Action | Proj Pts | % Start Trend | Proj | Rating | Comment | |
QB | 21.47 | 59% (+6) | 13 | Completed 73% of his passes against them earlier this year while throwing for 411/2 so a good play at home. | ||||
WR | 7.08 | 39% (+4) | 130 | Played a bad game last week but especially with Webster on IR, they don't have a CB that can stop him. | ||||
WR | 9.14 | 42% (-15) | 83 | Has been underwhelming for sure but another 7 targets last week and should see a better matchup than Jackson if you need him, as this could be a shootout. | ||||
RB | 13.18 | 86% (+1) | 30 | Tougher matchup but the return of Rodgers would be absolutely huge, and while he's still a little sore with his ankle, he should want to show up the Steelers for passing on him in the draft. | ||||
TE | 6.17 | 27% (+5) | 125 | Very disappointing last week with only 4 targets but he knows this defense very well and he needs another look, as the Pats are giving up the 2nd most FPPG to TEs the last 5 weeks. | ||||
W/R | 12.52 | 94% (-1) | 35 | Had a decent 91/1 on the ground against them earlier this year and a surprising 6/73 in the passing attack. | ||||
W/R/T | 9.76 | 68% (+1) | 75 | Tougher matchup but he did put up 9/125/2 on 13 targets a couple weeks ago against them, so hard to sit. | ||||
BN | 20.27 | 81% (-5) | 11 | Pretty tough call coming off a so game but he did complete 65% of his passes against them a few weeks ago and the Saint defense isn't nearly as good on the road. | ||||
BN | 2.63 | 8% (–) | 1945 | Very hard to trust in this offense but he did have 6 targets last week and the Giants secondary is at least vulnerable, plus they're home. | ||||
BN | 5.61 | 23% (–) | 142 | Tampa actually has given up production to the TE lately, but no way you can trust him. | ||||
BN | 1.52 | 2% (-1) | 2458 | Did have 6 targets last week and the matchup is pretty solid but a risky start this late in the season. | ||||
BN | 2.52 | 0% (–) | 2326 | Caught only 3 of his 7 targets last week so he remains unreliable. | ||||
BN | 1.40 | 0% (–) | 2499 |
Fantasy | Rank | Matchup | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pos | Kickers | Action | Proj Pts | % Start Trend | Proj | Rating | Comment | |
K | 8.03 | 27% (+2) | 226 | Only 1 FG in his last 3 games so a shaky play although we like the matchup if you need a reach. |
Fantasy | Rank | Matchup | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pos | Defense/Special Teams | Action | Proj Pts | % Start Trend | Proj | Rating | Comment | |
DEF | Buffalo - DEF
| 17.00 | 30% (-7) | 137 | Getting it done lately for fantasy with 6 sacks and 4 INTs the last 2 weeks but Tannehill, while he has some protection issues, has been borderline brilliant lately. | |||
BN | New England - DEF
| 16.56 | 62% (-5) | 151 | They've come up pretty small for fantasy so not a great option at all and it's below average by the numbers. |