Level | Rating | Percentiles | |
---|---|---|---|
Diamond | 900+ | 99th | |
Platinum | 800-899 | 95th-98th | |
Gold | 700-799 | 81st-94th | |
Silver | 600-699 | 60th-80th | |
Bronze | 0-599 | 0-59th |
Fantasy | Rank | Matchup | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pos | Offense | Action | Proj Pts | % Start Trend | Proj | Rating | Comment | |
QB | 17.65 | 99% (–) | 1 | Texan defense has been decent against the pass but they're certainly beatable and he won't have any weather issues in this one. | ||||
WR | 7.14 | 87% (+4) | 52 | Nothing scary at all about the matchup other than the fact that the Rams are pretty good on defense at home, yet we know he'll get plenty of looks. | ||||
WR | 5.11 | 90% (-1) | 110 | Came up small last week but likely gets the better matchup than Thomas and hard to pass on this offense's firepower. | ||||
RB | 7.64 | 84% (+4) | 55 | A healthy Gore could kill them at home with solid volume yet ankle and potential playing time issues present some downside. | ||||
RB | 5.67 | 48% (-3) | 127 | Mathews was injured early in the previous matchup and Woodhead ended up catching all 9 of his targets, yet even with Mathews emerging, a solid play as the Raiders give up the 2nd most FPPG to RBs the last 5 weeks. | ||||
TE | 3.69 | 60% (-3) | 140 | He did put up 7/74 against them earlier this year so not a bad play at all if you need him. | ||||
W/R | 7.89 | 21% (-3) | 38 | The Texans do give up the 5th most FPPG to RBs the last 5 weeks and he played a healthy 19 snaps last week and a surprising 5/49 in the passing game. | ||||
BN | 3.63 | 12% (-3) | 147 | Inactive last week so find another option for Week Sixteen, perhaps Texan TE Griffin. | ||||
BN | 4.64 | 56% (+3) | 120 | Pretty hard to ask for a better matchup against a bad defense at home and the Niners should be pushing hard to win. | ||||
BN | 7.15 | 33% (-6) | 69 | Not expected to play this week. | ||||
BN | 5.27 | 68% (+11) | 107 | He did have a decent 5/76 earlier this year against them but the Bills secondary has been stingy, giving up the 2nd fewest FPPG to WRs the last 5 weeks. | ||||
BN | 5.69 | 20% (-1) | 102 | Came up pretty small last week but he did play 27 snaps and his 5/49 in the passing game did help. |
Fantasy | Rank | Matchup | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pos | Kickers | Action | Proj Pts | % Start Trend | Proj | Rating | Comment | |
K | 8.38 | 66% (+11) | 209 | He's been an absolute stud the last 10 weeks or so and he's 11/11 in his last 3 so he must be started. | ||||
BN | 6.73 | 5% (–) | 1811 | Did have 3 FGs last week but forget it on the road in Seattle as the offense could be stifled. |
Fantasy | Rank | Matchup | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pos | Defense/Special Teams | Action | Proj Pts | % Start Trend | Proj | Rating | Comment | |
DEF | Carolina - DEF
| 6.84 | 62% (-23) | 192 | They have only 5 sacks total against Brees in their last 3 games and earlier this year they did very little, so while their body of work has been great and they're at home, they're kind of a fringe starter this week. | |||
BN | New England - DEF
| 7.43 | 62% (-5) | 151 | They've come up pretty small for fantasy so not a great option at all and it's below average by the numbers. |
Fantasy | Rank | Matchup | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pos | Defensive Players | Action | Proj Pts | % Start Trend | Proj | Rating | Comment | |
D | 6.74 | 82% (-3) | 665 | |||||
DB | 6.36 | 17% (+2) | 1471 | |||||
DB | 1.22 | 0% (–) | 1401 | |||||
DL | 9.56 | 74% (-3) | 927 | |||||
DL | 4.62 | 19% (-2) | 884 | |||||
LB | 10.53 | 44% (+1) | 1207 | |||||
LB | 7.74 | 70% (+2) | 1109 | |||||
BN | 1.58 | 4% (-1) | 1429 | |||||
BN | 9.02 | 72% (+2) | 327 |