Level | Rating | Percentiles | |
---|---|---|---|
Diamond | 900+ | 99th | |
Platinum | 800-899 | 95th-98th | |
Gold | 700-799 | 81st-94th | |
Silver | 600-699 | 60th-80th | |
Bronze | 0-599 | 0-59th |
Fantasy | Rank | Matchup | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pos | Offense | Action | Proj Pts | % Start Trend | Proj | Rating | Comment | |
QB | 27.93 | 94% (-3) | 2 | Tougher matchup on the road but he did throw for 313/4 against them a couple of weeks ago while completing 71% of his passes. | ||||
QB | 0.13 | 4% (-2) | 2727 | |||||
WR | 24.27 | 97% (+1) | 27 | The Skins really put the clamps down on him a few weeks ago as he put up 5/36 but you have to start him in what could be a shootout. | ||||
WR | 10.31 | 37% (-15) | 188 | Caught 5 of his 7 targets last week which was decent but his 37 yards was a killer and the Niners do give up the 5th fewest FPPG to WRs the last 5 weeks. | ||||
RB | 4.35 | 44% (+5) | 266 | Disappointed last week with only 11/23 rushing but at least the Rams have been shaky against RBs all year and give up the 9th most FPPG to RBs the last 5 weeks which includes 9 catches per game to RBs. | ||||
TE | 12.47 | 33% (-30) | 115 | The Jets have been shaky against the TE all year for the most part but he suffered a concussion last week and came up small so we'll check status. | ||||
W/R/T | 23.07 | 93% (–) | 39 | Little quiet last week with only 6 targets but he still put up 5/66/1 and the Packers give up the 3rd most FPPG to WRs the last 5 weeks. | ||||
W/R/T | 21.55 | 87% (+4) | 52 | Nothing scary at all about the matchup other than the fact that the Rams are pretty good on defense at home, yet we know he'll get plenty of looks. | ||||
W/R/T | 16.77 | 69% (+9) | 93 | At this point he's putting up massive numbers and after 19 targets last week you have to start him, especially in a PPR. | ||||
W/R/T | 15.06 | 82% (+15) | 90 | Giants have given up a RB TD three straight games and 22 RB catches their last 3 games, so they have slipped against the position. | ||||
BN | 10.76 | 23% (–) | 142 | Tampa actually has given up production to the TE lately, but no way you can trust him. | ||||
BN | 17.07 | 54% (-4) | 82 | Opportunity was crushed last week by Jamaal Charles and while he'll see a lot of top CB Davis, he's very viable at home as this offense has been making plays and putting up points. | ||||
BN | 14.70 | 56% (-2) | 67 | Did look good last week and almost popped off a bigger play but body of work makes him only a flex and Miami is giving up the 3rd fewest FPPG to RBs the last 5 weeks. | ||||
BN | 0.00 | 1% (–) | 2752 | Pryor actually completed 78% of his passes earlier against them this year and it's a good matchup, plus McGloin has been putting up numbers. | ||||
BN | 0.11 | 1% (+1) | 2733 | Yet another poor game last week so no reason to consider him against a pretty solid defense overall. | ||||
BN | 15.12 | 35% (–) | 103 | He did put up 4/77 against them earlier this year in Arizona but he could be slowed down by the great Patrick Peterson. | ||||
BN | 12.17 | 48% (–) | 89 | Had a decent game against them earlier this year on the strength of a TD and 4/49 receiving but Miami is giving up the 3rd fewest FPPG to RBs the last 5 weeks. |
Fantasy | Rank | Matchup | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pos | Kickers | Action | Proj Pts | % Start Trend | Proj | Rating | Comment | |
K | 8.51 | 90% (+1) | 193 | Still not getting a ton of kicks but thanks to his 13 XPTs over the last 3 weeks, he's been very solid, and this is as good of a matchup as it gets with no weather issues. |
Fantasy | Rank | Matchup | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pos | Defense/Special Teams | Action | Proj Pts | % Start Trend | Proj | Rating | Comment | |
DEF | Buffalo - DEF
| 12.53 | 30% (-7) | 137 | Getting it done lately for fantasy with 6 sacks and 4 INTs the last 2 weeks but Tannehill, while he has some protection issues, has been borderline brilliant lately. | |||
BN | Tennessee - DEF
| 14.28 | 20% (+4) | 181 | They've been almost completely worthless for fantasy the last 2 weeks but at least it's a beatable matchup. |