Level | Rating | Percentiles | |
---|---|---|---|
![]() |
Diamond | 900+ | 99th |
![]() |
Platinum | 800-899 | 95th-98th |
![]() |
Gold | 700-799 | 81st-94th |
![]() |
Silver | 600-699 | 60th-80th |
![]() |
Bronze | 0-599 | 0-59th |
Fantasy | Rank | Matchup | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pos | Offense | Action | Proj Pts | % Start Trend | Proj | Rating | Comment | |
QB | 42 | 94% (–) | 2 | Has fallen off but he did put up 322 passing against them earlier this year and he's in the friendly confines of the Superdome. | ||||
WR | 12 | 26% (+1) | 80 | He's essentially been a top-20 WR the last month or so as he's been making plays. | ||||
WR | 12 | 96% (–) | 42 | Bengals say they'll play to win in Week Seventeen but we'll see if that changes later in the week but you're starting him. | ||||
WR | 0 | 0% (–) | 2602 | |||||
WR | 7 | 14% (–) | 122 | He's back in the mix with 13 targets last week and while he caught just 5 balls, his 54/1 did get it done. | ||||
RB | 10 | 48% (–) | 124 | It looks like the Chargers plan on playing Mathews but he is banged up so Woodhead could come through if you need him as the Chiefs have nothing to play for. | ||||
RB | 8 | 41% (-1) | 99 | Has really slowed down lately and the matchup isn't that great but at least he's at home and viable in a PPR. | ||||
RB | 15 | 97% (–) | 15 | You have to forget about last week and start him this week as he put up 29 FP against them earlier this year in a PPR. | ||||
RB | 0 | 7% (–) | 2461 | Only 2 touches last week as they rolled with Baker so a major long shot. | ||||
TE | 7 | 77% (+1) | 91 | He did put up 4/66/1 against them earlier this year so a strong play as their No. 1 receiving target. | ||||
TE | 6 | 91% (–) | 116 | Despite last week you might want to start him as he put up 8/180/2 against them earlier this year and the matchup couldn't be better. | ||||
TE | 6 | 26% (-1) | 121 | The timing with Flacco has just not been there and it doesn't help that Flacco is dealing with a knee injury, but he is getting targets still. | ||||
W/R/T | 6 | 1% (–) | 2408 | Has completely fallen off the map with only 1 target last week. | ||||
W/R/T | 0 | 0% (–) | 2623 | |||||
W/R/T | 12 | 2% (+2) | 236 | Had 2 fumbles last week which is obviously a problem but the Chiefs will likely hand the workload over to him and he does have plenty of talent and a beatable matchup. | ||||
Q/W/R/T | 26 | 32% (–) | 23 | Came through with a great matchup last week but a little different story this week, as he completed only 47% of his passes against them earlier this year although he did get 274/2. | ||||
Q/W/R/T | 0 | 14% (–) | 2710 | Definitely a little shaky and the Giants have been pretty stingy on defense so he's not a lock but RG3 did complete 75% of his passes against them earlier this year. | ||||
BN | 3 | 0% (–) | 2550 | |||||
BN | 0 | 4% (–) | 2727 | It looks like he'll be able to go on Sunday but not exactly a thrilling option. | ||||
BN | 3 | 9% (+1) | 254 | He is still involved with 6 targets last week and NO gives up the 6th most FFPG to TEs the last 5 weeks if desperate. | ||||
BN | 0 | 2% (–) | 2696 | Still a bit banged up and the running game was rendered completely useless last week and the Jets can stop the run well still. |
Fantasy | Rank | Matchup | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pos | Kickers | Action | Proj Pts | % Start Trend | Proj | Rating | Comment | |
K | 8 | 60% (–) | 234 | Only 5 FGs in his last 4 games and best to avoid with a tougher matchup. |
Fantasy | Rank | Matchup | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pos | Defense/Special Teams | Action | Proj Pts | % Start Trend | Proj | Rating | Comment | |
DEF | Miami - DEF
| 25 | 23% (+2) | 179 | They did have a very good game against the shaky Geno Smith earlier this year. | |||
BN | Buffalo - DEF
| 18 | 28% (-2) | 2334 | Huge game last week with 7 sacks and they did put up 14 fantasy points against them earlier this year. |
Fantasy | Rank | Matchup | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pos | Defensive Players | Action | Proj Pts | % Start Trend | Proj | Rating | Comment | |
D | 33 | 24% (–) | 520 | |||||
D | 29 | 30% (-1) | 413 | |||||
D | 21 | 2% (-1) | 1141 | |||||
D | 9 | 1% (–) | 853 |