Level | Rating | Percentiles | |
---|---|---|---|
![]() |
Diamond | 900+ | 99th |
![]() |
Platinum | 800-899 | 95th-98th |
![]() |
Gold | 700-799 | 81st-94th |
![]() |
Silver | 600-699 | 60th-80th |
![]() |
Bronze | 0-599 | 0-59th |
Fantasy | Rank | Matchup | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pos | Offense | Action | Proj Pts | % Start Trend | Proj | Rating | Comment | |
QB | 27 | 70% (–) | 14 | Put up 288/2 against them earlier this year and while the Bills secondary is improved he's probably someone to roll with, as they should play to win with Denver also playing a late game. | ||||
WR | 9 | 49% (–) | 97 | Getting the targets with 7 more in Week Sixteen but the big plays have dried up yet this matchup is solid. | ||||
WR | 7 | 12% (-1) | 119 | No way you can use him as he had just 4 targets last week and 1/8. | ||||
WR | 7 | 56% (–) | 123 | He did put up nice numbers in Week Sixteen but only 3/28 against them earlier this year but the presence of Crabtree will help. | ||||
WR | 0 | 0% (–) | 2653 | |||||
RB | 11 | 21% (–) | 47 | Has lost a lot of the trust he built up the last 2 weeks but they should cream them and the Raiders are giving up the most FFPG to RBs the last 5 weeks. | ||||
RB | 2 | 1% (–) | 2328 | |||||
RB | 4 | 0% (–) | 2327 | He's not nearly in the mix enough to consider. | ||||
RB | 0 | 0% (–) | 2539 | |||||
TE | 4 | 34% (–) | 160 | He's fallen off a cliff but it's a great matchup and he put up 5/77/1 against them earlier this year. | ||||
TE | 4 | 4% (–) | 161 | |||||
TE | 2 | 0% (–) | 1937 | |||||
W/R/T | 5 | 2% (–) | 182 | They have nothing to play for and there's no reason to even consider him. | ||||
W/R/T | 6 | 33% (–) | 112 | Has been cleared to practice but hard to say if he'll go in a meaningless game. | ||||
W/R/T | 0 | 1% (+1) | 2530 | Played a significant majority of the snaps at RB and came through with a TD so a viable long shot if you need him but it's not a great matchup. | ||||
Q/W/R/T | 23 | 14% (–) | 41 | Was clearly limited last week with his knee so a very risky play as he put up only 140/2 against them earlier this year. | ||||
Q/W/R/T | 15 | 2% (–) | 57 | |||||
BN | 0 | 0% (–) | 2528 | |||||
BN | 6 | 6% (–) | 120 | He will not play Week 16. |
Fantasy | Rank | Matchup | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pos | Kickers | Action | Proj Pts | % Start Trend | Proj | Rating | Comment | |
K | 8 | 7% (–) | 231 | A little shaky very recently but he's been pretty good over the last 5/6 weeks and has a chance in this one. | ||||
BN | 7 | 5% (–) | 263 | He does have a decent 6 FGs in his last 4 games so viable but you could do better. |
Fantasy | Rank | Matchup | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pos | Defense/Special Teams | Action | Proj Pts | % Start Trend | Proj | Rating | Comment | |
DEF | San Francisco - DEF
| 27 | 87% (–) | 152 | Very nice game for fantasy against them earlier this year and while they're not a lock they are worth a shot as Palmer can be shaky. | |||
BN | Philadelphia - DEF
| 16 | 6% (–) | 2475 | Dallas starting the immobile Kyle Orton who has not played all year and Philly's D is coming off best game of the season. |
Fantasy | Rank | Matchup | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pos | Defensive Players | Action | Proj Pts | % Start Trend | Proj | Rating | Comment | |
D | 29 | 4% (–) | 1121 | |||||
D | 21 | 13% (–) | 337 | |||||
D | 15 | 4% (–) | 1432 | |||||
D | 22 | 33% (–) | 1353 | |||||
BN | 22 | 35% (–) | 1398 |