Level | Rating | Percentiles | |
---|---|---|---|
Diamond | 900+ | 99th | |
Platinum | 800-899 | 95th-98th | |
Gold | 700-799 | 81st-94th | |
Silver | 600-699 | 60th-80th | |
Bronze | 0-599 | 0-59th |
Fantasy | Rank | Matchup | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pos | Offense | Action | Proj Pts | % Start Trend | Proj | Rating | Comment | |
QB | 21.11 | 83% (+1) | 3 | Raider secondary is still very bad and vulnerable and he's been putting up big numbers down the stretch. | ||||
WR | 9.66 | 79% (–) | 83 | Another nice game last week on 9 targets and the Raider secondary can certainly be had. | ||||
WR | 12.87 | 93% (-1) | 38 | Could be slowed by top CB Haden, but Thomas can beat anyone, so hard to sit. | ||||
WR | 12.03 | 29% (+6) | 66 | A solid 11 targets last week and a nice PPR game, so viable if you need him. | ||||
RB | 17.14 | 99% (–) | 10 | Ran very well last week and Vikes giving up 11th-most PPG to RBs the last 5 weeks, so start him. | ||||
RB | 9.31 | 46% (-4) | 81 | Chargers have been solid against the run all year but they should be inclined to run it a ton. | ||||
TE | 8.17 | 58% (-3) | 100 | Should've scored at least 1 TD last week, but lack of production continues, and he didn't catch a pass against them earlier this year. | ||||
W/R/T | 5.15 | 5% (+1) | 177 | Did not practice on Wednesday or Thursday so even if he's active like last week, you can't start him. | ||||
BN | 2.16 | 3% (–) | 1737 | Five carries last week but only played 8 snaps so you can't use him. | ||||
BN | 0.00 | 1% (–) | 2449 | |||||
BN | 3.37 | 4% (–) | 218 | Played only 6 snaps last week, but he could always score, not that you can use him. | ||||
BN | 5.22 | 7% (–) | 149 | Only 3 targets last week but that was 3 more than Tamme. | ||||
BN | 5.92 | 4% (–) | 157 | Status up in the air after missing last week's game. | ||||
BN | 9.29 | 15% (-4) | 87 | Unlike last week, the Panthers are good enough to get him some garbage time production, so a decent bet for solid numbers if you need him. | ||||
BN | 3.41 | 1% (–) | 269 | He did play 19 snaps last week, not that you can use him. | ||||
BN | 3.02 | 0% (–) | 2390 | |||||
BN | 0.00 | 1% (–) | 2494 | |||||
BN | 0.34 | 0% (–) | 2311 | Inactive last week and still banged up this week so he's not worth considering. | ||||
BN | 0.00 | 0% (–) | 2426 |
Fantasy | Rank | Matchup | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pos | Kickers | Action | Proj Pts | % Start Trend | Proj | Rating | Comment | |
K | 6.87 | 55% (–) | 230 | He's now missed four field goals in his last four games but still putting up good numbers. | ||||
BN | 8.78 | 78% (-4) | 156 | You like that he's kicking at home indoors, but some downside if they fall behind. |
Fantasy | Rank | Matchup | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pos | Defense/Special Teams | Action | Proj Pts | % Start Trend | Proj | Rating | Comment | |
DEF | San Francisco - DEF
| 6.71 | 68% (+5) | 2194 | Certainly has potential and a big game last week, but Wilson and the Seahawks giving up the 2nd-fewest FPG to D/STs over the last five weeks. | |||
BN | Cincinnati - DEF
| 8.55 | 32% (-13) | 221 | Solid-game last week as well as against the Steelers earlier this year, and Pittsburgh still giving up some numbers with O-line issues. |