Level | Rating | Percentiles | |
---|---|---|---|
Diamond | 900+ | 99th | |
Platinum | 800-899 | 95th-98th | |
Gold | 700-799 | 81st-94th | |
Silver | 600-699 | 60th-80th | |
Bronze | 0-599 | 0-59th |
Fantasy | Rank | Matchup | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pos | Offense | Action | Proj Pts | % Start Trend | Proj | Rating | Comment | |
QB | 25 | 96% (–) | 6 | Panthers actually stingy vs. pass lately but he threw for 325 against them earlier this year. | ||||
WR | 5 | 2% (–) | 148 | Monster game last week for PPR on 12 targets, and he's done with Vick in the past. | ||||
WR | 1 | 1% (–) | 2185 | Very good matchup but only 2 targets last week. | ||||
RB | 22 | 97% (–) | 1 | Ran for 210/1 against them a few weeks ago so you should probably start him. | ||||
TE | 5 | 48% (–) | 110 | Coming on a bit lately and 8 targets last week and he did put up 6/60 against them earlier this year so not a horrible play at all. | ||||
W/R/T | 14 | 86% (+1) | 14 | Really came up small last week and didn't do much against them earlier this year, but the Niners need to play to win. | ||||
BN | 0 | 40% (-4) | 2448 | He's on IR. | ||||
BN | 4 | 10% (–) | 185 | Still in the mix with 5 targets last week, but not making the big plays these days, so hard to trust. | ||||
BN | 1 | 0% (–) | 2171 | |||||
BN | 19 | 40% (–) | 19 | Colts expected to play mainly to win but little to play for and didn't do much against them earlier this year so not a must-start. | ||||
BN | 2 | 0% (–) | 1728 | If they rest Jones and White as expected, someone else has to play, so has a chance against a bad defense. | ||||
BN | 6 | 10% (+1) | 93 | It is a very good matchup and he did put 4/56 against them earlier this year, plus no Shorts helps. | ||||
BN | 3 | 4% (–) | 204 | Will have to start for Manningham and 6 targets last week, so not a horrible Hail Mary play. | ||||
BN | 1 | 0% (–) | 1746 | |||||
BN | 0 | 2% (–) | 2553 | |||||
BN | 8 | 17% (+1) | 86 | Put up 9/73 last week as he is clearly at worst their 3rd down and hurry-up back so decent in PPR. | ||||
BN | 3 | 0% (–) | 172 | Inactive last week and still banged up this week so he's not worth considering. | ||||
BN | 3 | 0% (–) | 251 | LaFell is back and Murphy has done very little all year anyway. | ||||
BN | 1 | 0% (–) | 2179 |
Fantasy | Rank | Matchup | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pos | Kickers | Action | Proj Pts | % Start Trend | Proj | Rating | Comment | |
K | 8 | 3% (–) | 157 | Not the greatest option as you never know what you'll get from this offense. | ||||
BN | 8 | 42% (–) | 162 | Was actually 2/2 last week and 7 XPs but he's still incredibly shaky with 12 misses this year. | ||||
BN | 9 | 1% (–) | 142 | Had 3 FGs last week but only 4 total in four games prior to that so tough guy to use. |
Fantasy | Rank | Matchup | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pos | Defense/Special Teams | Action | Proj Pts | % Start Trend | Proj | Rating | Comment | |
DEF | Green Bay - DEF
| 11 | 68% (-1) | 147 | Ponder and the Vikings haven't been a great matchup, but Packer did have a huge game last week and they intercepted the young QB twice a few weeks ago. | |||
BN | Tennessee - DEF
| 10 | 3% (+1) | 198 | They did get 7 sacks against the Jags earlier this year, but still hard to trust. |