Level | Rating | Percentiles | |
---|---|---|---|
Diamond | 900+ | 99th | |
Platinum | 800-899 | 95th-98th | |
Gold | 700-799 | 81st-94th | |
Silver | 600-699 | 60th-80th | |
Bronze | 0-599 | 0-59th |
Fantasy | Rank | Matchup | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pos | Offense | Action | Proj Pts | % Start Trend | Proj | Rating | Comment | |
QB | 25 | 83% (–) | 4 | He completed 70% of his passed against them earlier this year and the matchup is very solid and no playing time issues. | ||||
WR | 0 | 75% (-3) | 2462 | He's out this week. | ||||
WR | 9 | 36% (+2) | 49 | Not a lock in a meaningless game with Haden matchup considering Wallace is out. | ||||
RB | 8 | 82% (-1) | 69 | As of early in the week it looked like he was going to play and it's a solid matchup in a game they still need to win. | ||||
TE | 8 | 85% (+1) | 58 | Another rock-solid game last week, and put up 9/74 against them earlier this year. | ||||
W/R/T | 10 | 94% (+1) | 34 | Solid matchup and he put up 82/1 against them a few weeks ago. | ||||
BN | 5 | 41% (+1) | 138 | Nice game last week on 11 targets but matchup isn't great and they don't have much to play for. | ||||
BN | 11 | 34% (+1) | 29 | Put up 69/1 against them earlier this year but came up small last week even with Stewart out. | ||||
BN | 17 | 4% (–) | 32 | Had a decent game against them earlier this year and solid matchup, but he's very hard to trust right now against anyone. | ||||
BN | 16 | 30% (–) | 41 | Certainly a beatable matchup and they do have something to play for and completed 74% of his passes against them 2 weeks ago. | ||||
BN | 0 | 2% (–) | 2485 | He is not expected to play Week 17. | ||||
BN | 4 | 2% (–) | 180 | Played a solid 24 snaps last week but didn't do much with 7 snaps last week so hard to trust. | ||||
BN | 0 | 1% (–) | 2403 | |||||
BN | 5 | 16% (+1) | 127 | Showing his downside lately and only 3 targets last week, but not a horrible option. | ||||
BN | 0 | 0% (–) | 2336 | |||||
BN | 4 | 7% (–) | 136 | Still very much in the mix, but still hoping he scores if you're considering him | ||||
BN | 3 | 0% (–) | 255 | |||||
BN | 2 | 0% (–) | 225 | Beatable matchup but they continue to use backup McCoy as well. |
Fantasy | Rank | Matchup | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pos | Kickers | Action | Proj Pts | % Start Trend | Proj | Rating | Comment | |
K | 10 | 58% (–) | 113 | Steady option has had between 7 and 11 FP in eight straight games. | ||||
BN | 10 | 23% (+1) | 100 | Has 2 FGs in four straight games but he did miss one last week. Still a solid option. | ||||
BN | 0 | 0% (–) | 2204 |
Fantasy | Rank | Matchup | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pos | Defense/Special Teams | Action | Proj Pts | % Start Trend | Proj | Rating | Comment | |
DEF | New York - DEF
| 9 | 39% (–) | 238 | Solid 4 sacks last week, so you could do worse as the Bills give up the 6th-most FPG to D/STs over the last five weeks. | |||
BN | Kansas City - DEF
| 6 | 1% (–) | 2374 | Denver is giving up the 2nd-fewest FPG to D/STs over the last five weeks and they did nothing against them a few weeks ago. | |||
BN | Denver - DEF
| 13 | 78% (+1) | 98 | Came up small earlier this year against them, but they did have a nice 6 sacks last week and it's a good matchup. |