Level | Rating | Percentiles | |
---|---|---|---|
Diamond | 900+ | 99th | |
Platinum | 800-899 | 95th-98th | |
Gold | 700-799 | 81st-94th | |
Silver | 600-699 | 60th-80th | |
Bronze | 0-599 | 0-59th |
Fantasy | Rank | Matchup | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pos | Offense | Action | Proj Pts | % Start Trend | Proj | Rating | Comment | |
QB | 21 | 24% (+1) | 13 | Niner passing game really broke this defense down earlier this year as Smith completed 94% of his passes so strong play as they will play to win. | ||||
WR | 2 | 2% (–) | 2193 | Only 1 target last week, so you can't use him. | ||||
WR | 1 | 0% (–) | 2277 | |||||
WR | 0 | 0% (–) | 1952 | |||||
WR | 2 | 0% (–) | 273 | They are looking at a bunch of other options and Sanchez is back out of necessity so not worth using. | ||||
RB | 0 | 0% (–) | 2488 | |||||
RB | 0 | 0% (–) | 2304 | |||||
RB | 1 | 0% (–) | 2483 | |||||
RB | 8 | 64% (+1) | 83 | Came through with 71/1 against them earlier this year so while matchup is tougher, the Pats should be in control here. | ||||
TE | 3 | 32% (–) | 227 | He's slammed into a brick wall production--wise so not someone you can use with Pryor in at QB. | ||||
TE | 2 | 0% (–) | 250 | |||||
TE | 1 | 0% (–) | 1752 | |||||
W/R/T | 1 | 0% (–) | 1867 | He has gotten only a handful of snaps since Jackson went down, so forget it. | ||||
W/R/T | 2 | 28% (–) | 2282 | Played only 10 snaps with 4 touches last week so hard to use unless desperate. | ||||
W/R/T | 2 | 1% (–) | 237 | He actually did something last week, but was shutout a couple weeks ago against this defense, so forget it. | ||||
Q/W/R/T | 8 | 51% (+1) | 78 | Another 9 targets last week and should be active, plus had 72/2 against them earlier this year. | ||||
Q/W/R/T | 8 | 81% (–) | 68 | Quiet last week but he did have an endzone target, and he did put 8/97 against them earlier this year. | ||||
BN | 1 | 1% (–) | 2200 | |||||
BN | 1 | 0% (–) | 2194 | |||||
BN | 3 | 0% (–) | 253 | |||||
BN | 0 | 0% (–) | 2568 |
Fantasy | Rank | Matchup | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pos | Kickers | Action | Proj Pts | % Start Trend | Proj | Rating | Comment | |
K | 0 | 5% (–) | 2579 |
Fantasy | Rank | Matchup | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pos | Defense/Special Teams | Action | Proj Pts | % Start Trend | Proj | Rating | Comment | |
DEF | Indianapolis - DEF
| 11 | 12% (-2) | 2371 | Need a good matchup for them to come through and this is not a good matchup. |
Fantasy | Rank | Matchup | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pos | Defensive Players | Action | Proj Pts | % Start Trend | Proj | Rating | Comment | |
D | 17 | 21% (–) | 481 | |||||
D | 23 | 14% (-1) | 1011 | |||||
D | 16 | 3% (-1) | 476 | |||||
D | 14 | 3% (–) | 365 | |||||
BN | 20 | 11% (-1) | 963 |