Level | Rating | Percentiles | |
---|---|---|---|
![]() |
Diamond | 900+ | 99th |
![]() |
Platinum | 800-899 | 95th-98th |
![]() |
Gold | 700-799 | 81st-94th |
![]() |
Silver | 600-699 | 60th-80th |
![]() |
Bronze | 0-599 | 0-59th |
Fantasy | Rank | Matchup | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pos | Offense | Action | Proj Pts | % Start Trend | Proj | Rating | Comment | |
QB | 15 | 82% (-4) | 77 | It's a great matchup but we can't expect him to play more than a half and it could be a lot less than that. | ||||
WR | 9 | 85% (–) | 60 | Colts say they will play to win but the aged Wayne may still take things easy for a portion of the game. | ||||
WR | 7 | 1% (–) | 2192 | |||||
WR | 6 | 27% (+1) | 106 | Played injured last week and only 2 targets, but with Finnegan banged up, he has a chance in a meaningful game. | ||||
WR | 10 | 53% (–) | 54 | Quiet against them a few week ago but he did have 6 catches on 12 targets last week. | ||||
RB | 11 | 91% (–) | 26 | Huge game last week and he did put up 23/107 rushing against them a few weeks ago, but this is still a tougher matchup. | ||||
RB | 12 | 34% (+1) | 29 | Put up 69/1 against them earlier this year but came up small last week even with Stewart out. | ||||
RB | 3 | 4% (–) | 257 | Surprised with 15 carries last week but did nothing against them a few weeks ago and Denver is a top run defense. | ||||
RB | 0 | 0% (–) | 2339 | |||||
TE | 6 | 48% (–) | 110 | Coming on a bit lately and 8 targets last week and he did put up 6/60 against them earlier this year so not a horrible play at all. | ||||
TE | 4 | 7% (–) | 136 | Still very much in the mix, but still hoping he scores if you're considering him | ||||
TE | 3 | 28% (+1) | 166 | Eagles have improved against the TE, and he was quiet against them earlier this year, so hard to feel great. | ||||
W/R/T | 5 | 31% (–) | 218 | Came up small last week after QB change, so hard to trust with Pryor. | ||||
W/R/T | 9 | 61% (+2) | 67 | Has been very solid in December and put up 13/128 in the passing game against them earlier this year and Panthers giving up 7 RB catches per game last 5. | ||||
W/R/T | 0 | 9% (–) | 2540 | Had a setback so not expected to play. | ||||
Q/W/R/T | 32 | 82% (–) | 10 | Still has something to play for and had a solid 285/2 against them a few weeks ago so still solid option for sure. | ||||
Q/W/R/T | 0 | 0% (–) | 2588 | He's starting but has never taken an NFL snap so forget it. | ||||
BN | 2 | 0% (–) | 1733 | Continues to see a ton of snaps and 7 targets last week, and he won't see Cromartie. | ||||
BN | 4 | 0% (–) | 197 | A solid 10 carries last week and they will definitely look to get him carries but tougher spot here against solid run defense. | ||||
BN | 0 | 0% (–) | 2548 |
Fantasy | Rank | Matchup | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pos | Kickers | Action | Proj Pts | % Start Trend | Proj | Rating | Comment | |
K | 8 | 78% (–) | 177 | Offense has started to dry up but that's actually meant 11 FG attempts the last four weeks for Hanson. |
Fantasy | Rank | Matchup | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pos | Defense/Special Teams | Action | Proj Pts | % Start Trend | Proj | Rating | Comment | |
DEF | New York - DEF
| 14 | 39% (–) | 238 | Solid 4 sacks last week, so you could do worse as the Bills give up the 6th-most FPG to D/STs over the last five weeks. | |||
BN | Pittsburgh - DEF
| 22 | 52% (+2) | 72 | Came through with 6 sacks last week and they could face off against the #2 or #3 QB this week. |
Fantasy | Rank | Matchup | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pos | Defensive Players | Action | Proj Pts | % Start Trend | Proj | Rating | Comment | |
D | 22 | 35% (-2) | 1126 | |||||
D | 13 | 14% (-1) | 1048 | |||||
D | 24 | 14% (-1) | 1185 | |||||
D | 21 | 2% (-1) | 1194 | |||||
BN | 20 | 46% (–) | 1307 |