Level | Rating | Percentiles | |
---|---|---|---|
![]() |
Diamond | 900+ | 99th |
![]() |
Platinum | 800-899 | 95th-98th |
![]() |
Gold | 700-799 | 81st-94th |
![]() |
Silver | 600-699 | 60th-80th |
![]() |
Bronze | 0-599 | 0-59th |
Fantasy | Rank | Matchup | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pos | Offense | Action | Proj Pts | % Start Trend | Proj | Rating | Comment | |
QB | 27 | 57% (+1) | 18 | Put up 309/2 vs. them several weeks ago but struggles continue and Phi D has improved despite numbers, so he's no lock but will at least play whole game. | ||||
WR | 8 | 2% (–) | 2306 | |||||
WR | 0 | 0% (–) | 2387 | |||||
WR | 0 | 3% (+1) | 2427 | |||||
WR | 0 | 0% (–) | 2439 | |||||
RB | 9 | 71% (–) | 51 | Huge game last week with 3 TDs and seems to be more involved in passing game lately, which is key as Dolphins should be behind. | ||||
RB | 12 | 47% (+2) | 22 | Nothing special against them earlier this year and Philly run defense is improved, but worth using if you need him as they will play to win for sure. | ||||
RB | 0 | 6% (–) | 2502 | |||||
RB | 0 | 4% (–) | 2517 | |||||
TE | 8 | 90% (-1) | 74 | Solid matchup but he has a serious playing time issue so unless there are clear indications he will play a lot, he's not someone to use. | ||||
TE | 0 | 5% (–) | 2347 | |||||
TE | 0 | 0% (–) | 2331 | |||||
W/R/T | 0 | 0% (–) | 2380 | |||||
W/R/T | 2 | 0% (–) | 1737 | He's getting a few looks each week, but that's about it. | ||||
W/R/T | 0 | 0% (–) | 2373 | |||||
Q/W/R/T | 10 | 14% (-1) | 151 | He did complete 72% of his passes against them earlier this year but they really don't have much to play for. | ||||
Q/W/R/T | 31 | 83% (–) | 4 | He completed 70% of his passed against them earlier this year and the matchup is very solid and no playing time issues. | ||||
BN | 0 | 0% (–) | 2434 | |||||
BN | 4 | 5% (–) | 153 | Missing practice again early in the week, so probably out again. | ||||
BN | 2 | 0% (–) | 2182 | He did get a goal line chance on top of the goal last week so he's in the mix as goal line back. | ||||
BN | 0 | 2% (–) | 2485 | He is not expected to play Week 17. |
Fantasy | Rank | Matchup | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pos | Kickers | Action | Proj Pts | % Start Trend | Proj | Rating | Comment | |
K | 10 | 23% (+1) | 100 | Has 2 FGs in four straight games but he did miss one last week. Still a solid option. |
Fantasy | Rank | Matchup | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pos | Defense/Special Teams | Action | Proj Pts | % Start Trend | Proj | Rating | Comment | |
DEF | New York - DEF
| 18 | 40% (+1) | 143 | Vick could certainly help but they have only 2 sacks total in their last four games, and did nothing against them earlier this year. | |||
BN | New England - DEF
| 17 | 69% (-1) | 186 | Haven't really done much lately, but Tannehill's receiving corps is pretty shabby, so they have a chance. |
Fantasy | Rank | Matchup | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pos | Defensive Players | Action | Proj Pts | % Start Trend | Proj | Rating | Comment | |
D | 31 | 69% (–) | 1053 | |||||
D | 34 | 52% (–) | 1201 | |||||
D | 31 | 31% (-1) | 1000 | |||||
D | 13 | 7% (–) | 318 |