Level | Rating | Percentiles | |
---|---|---|---|
Diamond | 900+ | 99th | |
Platinum | 800-899 | 95th-98th | |
Gold | 700-799 | 81st-94th | |
Silver | 600-699 | 60th-80th | |
Bronze | 0-599 | 0-59th |
Fantasy | Rank | Matchup | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pos | Offense | Action | Proj Pts | % Start Trend | Proj | Rating | Comment | |
QB | 19.24 | 8% (–) | 70 | Didn't do well against them earlier this year and other than Johnson and Chandler, his receiving corps is really thin. | ||||
WR | 8.96 | 85% (-4) | 75 | Disappointing last week, but had a TD taken off the board and as much as they'll have/want to throw it he should be involved. | ||||
WR | 9.04 | 45% (-2) | 73 | Decent matchup and with Smith iffy, figure that he'll get targets but hard to trust. | ||||
WR | 10.27 | 93% (-3) | 55 | Lack of production was baffling but the Raven secondary is still vulnerable and Manning should play better. | ||||
RB | 11.14 | 66% (-1) | 61 | Held out of practice early in the week with an illness, and while active last week matchup is tougher and his snaps were down. | ||||
RB | 11.41 | 82% (-3) | 57 | Packers are actually giving up the 2nd-most FPG to RBs over the last five weeks, but the numbers are deceiving, so some downside on the road. | ||||
TE | 6.30 | 58% (-3) | 114 | Has underwhelmed lately but 4/40 on 7 targets isn't horrible, and they play well at home. | ||||
W/R/T | 10.98 | 33% (+10) | 63 | Never a sure thing but certainly it is a good matchup as Raiders give up the 8th-most FPG to RBs over the last five weeks, and it's not looking good for Stewart. | ||||
W/R/T | 9.01 | 59% (+2) | 77 | Another TD last week, so he continues to be solid and Cowboys still have issues at LB. | ||||
BN | 18.98 | 2% (–) | 68 | Bill defense played poorly last week and Tannehill has been solid the last two weeks, but he does need WR Bess to have best chance. | ||||
BN | 3.85 | 7% (-1) | 214 | Could always make a play, but riskier than usual because he's dealing with sore ribs. | ||||
BN | 4.84 | 6% (+3) | 174 | Has been active in production in last two games and Bucs give up the 2nd-most FPG to WRs over the last five weeks. | ||||
BN | 3.28 | 1% (–) | 246 | Played a solid 40 snaps last week and active with 6 targets, so you could do worse. | ||||
BN | 3.33 | 1% (+1) | 207 | Good matchup and he did score last week, but unreliable. | ||||
BN | 2.39 | 0% (–) | 2172 | |||||
BN | 2.74 | 0% (–) | 277 | Fairly active with 6 targets last week, but means little. |
Fantasy | Rank | Matchup | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pos | Kickers | Action | Proj Pts | % Start Trend | Proj | Rating | Comment | |
K | 9.60 | 7% (+3) | 133 | Solid option as he hasn't missed a kick yet, and he's getting opportunities. | ||||
BN | 7.86 | 19% (-1) | 189 | Good matchup but he hasn't been getting the opportunities lately. |
Fantasy | Rank | Matchup | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pos | Defense/Special Teams | Action | Proj Pts | % Start Trend | Proj | Rating | Comment | |
DEF | Cincinnati - DEF
| 8.55 | 32% (-13) | 221 | Solid-game last week as well as against the Steelers earlier this year, and Pittsburgh still giving up some numbers with O-line issues. |
Fantasy | Rank | Matchup | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pos | Defensive Players | Action | Proj Pts | % Start Trend | Proj | Rating | Comment | |
D | 9.86 | 54% (+1) | 1046 | |||||
D | 8.23 | 21% (+2) | 612 | |||||
D | 6.54 | 46% (–) | 1303 | |||||
BN | 0.00 | 11% (-5) | 535 | |||||
BN | 6.47 | 12% (–) | 286 |