Level | Rating | Percentiles | |
---|---|---|---|
![]() |
Diamond | 900+ | 99th |
![]() |
Platinum | 800-899 | 95th-98th |
![]() |
Gold | 700-799 | 81st-94th |
![]() |
Silver | 600-699 | 60th-80th |
![]() |
Bronze | 0-599 | 0-59th |
Fantasy | Rank | Matchup | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pos | Offense | Action | Proj Pts | % Start Trend | Proj | Rating | Comment | |
QB | 252.23 | 24% (+1) | 13 | Niner passing game really broke this defense down earlier this year as Smith completed 94% of his passes so strong play as they will play to win. | ||||
WR | 82.16 | 94% (+1) | 34 | Solid matchup and he put up 82/1 against them a few weeks ago. | ||||
WR | 58.43 | 60% (–) | 91 | Came up surprisingly small last week, earlier this year he put just 4/55 against Cromartie but he at least scored. | ||||
RB | 159.85 | 97% (–) | 1 | Ran for 210/1 against them a few weeks ago so you should probably start him. | ||||
RB | 0.00 | 94% (-2) | 2523 | Had 2 TDs against them earlier this year, but games doesn't mean much for them so we'll have to see if they plan to rest key guys. | ||||
TE | 42.60 | 59% (+1) | 109 | Has been underwhelming down the stretch, but still viable as they need to win the game. | ||||
TE | 53.97 | 81% (–) | 68 | Quiet last week but he did have an endzone target, and he did put 8/97 against them earlier this year. | ||||
Q/W/R/T | 248.59 | 3% (–) | 53 | Solid matchup as Titan defense was terrible last week and he got 261/2 off the bench vs. them earlier this year but won't have Shorts. | ||||
BN | 68.87 | 10% (–) | 2181 | Seeing a lot of snaps with McFadden back, but he hasn't been getting a lot touches, although he did catch 4 passes last week. | ||||
BN | 82.71 | 82% (–) | 52 | Johnson has been limited early in the week with ankle but he is expected to play and it is a good matchup. |
Fantasy | Rank | Matchup | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pos | Kickers | Action | Proj Pts | % Start Trend | Proj | Rating | Comment | |
K | 7.96 | 2% (–) | 241 | Had 2 FGs last week but that broke a two-week string without a single one so cant use Succop. |
Fantasy | Rank | Matchup | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pos | Defense/Special Teams | Action | Proj Pts | % Start Trend | Proj | Rating | Comment | |
DEF | New England - DEF
| 89.23 | 69% (-1) | 186 | Haven't really done much lately, but Tannehill's receiving corps is pretty shabby, so they have a chance. | |||
DEF | (Empty) | 0.00 | 0% (–) | - | ||||
BN | Seattle - DEF
| 96.31 | 67% (+2) | 164 | As we've seen lately, they should be started every week, and they're at home this week, which is great. |
Fantasy | Rank | Matchup | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pos | Defensive Players | Action | Proj Pts | % Start Trend | Proj | Rating | Comment | |
D | 57.97 | 3% (–) | 455 | |||||
D | 28.24 | 6% (–) | 1342 | |||||
DB | 44.63 | 1% (-1) | 441 | |||||
DL | 40.54 | 35% (–) | 1398 | |||||
DL | 31.85 | 6% (–) | 1348 | |||||
LB | 54.48 | 42% (-1) | 996 | |||||
LB | 67.88 | 47% (-1) | 1010 | |||||
DT | 32.69 | 3% (-1) | 797 | |||||
DE | 35.58 | 27% (–) | 1380 | |||||
CB | 43.82 | 4% (–) | 328 | |||||
S | 53.05 | 49% (-1) | 588 |