Level | Rating | Percentiles | |
---|---|---|---|
![]() |
Diamond | 900+ | 99th |
![]() |
Platinum | 800-899 | 95th-98th |
![]() |
Gold | 700-799 | 81st-94th |
![]() |
Silver | 600-699 | 60th-80th |
![]() |
Bronze | 0-599 | 0-59th |
Fantasy | Rank | Matchup | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pos | Offense | Action | Proj Pts | % Start Trend | Proj | Rating | Comment | |
QB | 16 | 18% (+1) | 13 | Very hard to trust but at least he was a little better last week and will play the whole game. | ||||
WR | 0 | 34% (–) | 2541 | |||||
WR | 0 | 10% (–) | 2547 | |||||
RB | 6 | 28% (+1) | 87 | Panthers are actually improved against the run somehow and Ingram out again but he did score last week and earlier this year against the Panthers. | ||||
RB | 0 | 3% (–) | 2623 | |||||
TE | 5 | 14% (–) | 118 | Actually looks like he will play now, but risky since he's been banged up. | ||||
W/R/T | 8 | 77% (-1) | 49 | Might have a playing-time issue in potentially meaningless game but he did score against them earlier this year. | ||||
BN | 0 | 5% (–) | 2318 | |||||
BN | 14 | 98% (–) | 12 | Looks like the Lions will play to win so while he may not play the entire game that's enough to start him. | ||||
BN | 4 | 1% (–) | 196 | Not a bad sneaky reach as the Saints give up the 6th-most FPG to WRs over the last five and no Naanee in this one. | ||||
BN | 0 | 1% (–) | 2540 |
Fantasy | Rank | Matchup | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pos | Kickers | Action | Proj Pts | % Start Trend | Proj | Rating | Comment | |
K | 0 | 1% (–) | 2710 |
Fantasy | Rank | Matchup | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pos | Defense/Special Teams | Action | Proj Pts | % Start Trend | Proj | Rating | Comment | |
DEF | Las Vegas - DEF
| 10 | 10% (–) | 223 | Always have a chance against divisional opponent but the Chargers are giving up the 5th-fewest FPG to defenses over the last five weeks. |