Level | Rating | Percentiles | |
---|---|---|---|
Diamond | 900+ | 99th | |
Platinum | 800-899 | 95th-98th | |
Gold | 700-799 | 81st-94th | |
Silver | 600-699 | 60th-80th | |
Bronze | 0-599 | 0-59th |
Fantasy | Rank | Matchup | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pos | Offense | Action | Proj Pts | % Start Trend | Proj | Rating | Comment | |
QB | 24.45 | 70% (+1) | 10 | Charger defense looks pretty solid but they're far from a shut-down group and this could be a high-scoring game. | ||||
WR | 11.64 | 31% (-3) | 91 | Already played in Week 16. | ||||
WR | 13.23 | 92% (–) | 54 | Even though it's Charlie Batch that actually might be an upgrade over injured Big Ben and Rams do start street FA types at CB. | ||||
WR | 11.91 | 41% (+1) | 90 | Already played in Week 16. | ||||
RB | 0.00 | 5% (-1) | 2629 | |||||
RB | 11.47 | 35% (+3) | 73 | Buc defense is awful and giving up 2nd most FPG to RBs in last five weeks and he got them for 16 FP earlier this year. | ||||
TE | 0.00 | 3% (–) | 2481 | |||||
W/T | 5.09 | 0% (–) | 244 | Only 2 targets last week so forget it. | ||||
W/R/T | 9.43 | 6% (+1) | 169 | |||||
BN | 17.42 | 25% (–) | 26 | Put up garbage time numbers last week but otherwise not playing well and hard to trust unless desperate. | ||||
BN | 3.86 | 0% (–) | 273 | He's been on the field lately but no reason to start a #2 TE. | ||||
BN | 0.00 | 0% (–) | 2610 | |||||
BN | 8.45 | 20% (-6) | 113 | Did okay last week but tougher matchup and Starks should be back in the mix. | ||||
BN | 0.00 | 1% (–) | 2699 |
Fantasy | Rank | Matchup | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pos | Kickers | Action | Proj Pts | % Start Trend | Proj | Rating | Comment | |
K | 9.51 | 61% (-1) | 153 | Already played in Week 16. | ||||
BN | 9.15 | 32% (–) | 161 | Has been solid lately with 9 FGs in four games and while Jags have major issues on defense, the Titans can always stall. |
Fantasy | Rank | Matchup | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pos | Defensive Players | Action | Proj Pts | % Start Trend | Proj | Rating | Comment | |
D | 6.41 | 2% (+1) | 275 | |||||
D | 11.67 | 22% (–) | 1653 | |||||
DL | 7.07 | 32% (–) | 897 | |||||
LB | 8.86 | 6% (-1) | 1539 | |||||
LB | 10.98 | 20% (+1) | 1579 | |||||
LB | 7.37 | 2% (–) | 1680 | |||||
DE | 7.44 | 17% (+1) | 1122 | |||||
S | 9.86 | 29% (+1) | 543 | |||||
BN | 4.97 | 0% (–) | 1824 | |||||
BN | 0.00 | 0% (–) | 1574 | |||||
BN | 4.70 | 4% (–) | 1134 |