Level | Rating | Percentiles | |
---|---|---|---|
Diamond | 900+ | 99th | |
Platinum | 800-899 | 95th-98th | |
Gold | 700-799 | 81st-94th | |
Silver | 600-699 | 60th-80th | |
Bronze | 0-599 | 0-59th |
Fantasy | Rank | Matchup | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pos | Offense | Action | Proj Pts | % Start Trend | Proj | Rating | Comment | |
QB | 27 | 55% (+1) | 15 | It's a huge game and he threw for 400/2 against them two weeks ago and he should get Manningham back. | ||||
WR | 6 | 42% (+1) | 111 | Saw some signs of life from Orlovsky last week and matchup is fantastic for possibly his last game as a Colt. | ||||
WR | 7 | 80% (–) | 78 | A little bit banged up but if he's out there on Sunday you've got to use him as he's their only guy. | ||||
WR | 3 | 7% (–) | 213 | He was on the field early last week but otherwise it was all Cotchery. | ||||
WR | 3 | 3% (–) | 204 | Only 1 catch against them earlier this year and only 5 targets last week. | ||||
RB | 12 | 86% (-1) | 23 | The ranking here assumed the Lions beat the Packers, which isn't a safe assumption so there are some potential playing time issues. | ||||
RB | 4 | 10% (–) | 170 | Still in the mix here as a runner and a receiver but a tougher matchup against solid defensive front. | ||||
RB | 2 | 2% (–) | 264 | Ravens should run a ton but the Bengals are pretty solid against RBs. | ||||
RB | 1 | 7% (–) | 2373 | If they rest the banged up Smith, Morris could have a chance and he did catch 8 balls against them several weeks ago after Smith left that game. | ||||
TE | 12 | 94% (–) | 20 | Put up 109/2 against them earlier this year so start him. | ||||
TE | 3 | 3% (–) | 201 | Looks like he'll return from a concussion and a good matchup if he goes. | ||||
TE | 4 | 9% (–) | 146 | He did score last week and the Ravens are thin at receiver so could come through again. | ||||
W/R/T | 5 | 3% (–) | 227 | If Moore's hammy is bothering him, that's one fewer mouth to feed which helps Henderson. | ||||
W/R/T | 7 | 53% (–) | 85 | Should be fine to play and in such a critical situation we think Romo will look for a guy who has developed into a go-to option. | ||||
W/R/T | 0 | 0% (–) | 2478 | |||||
Q/W/R/T | 4 | 11% (–) | 184 | He should have scored last week but he fell down, which tells you what you need to know. | ||||
Q/W/R/T | 5 | 14% (–) | 118 | Actually looks like he will play now, but risky since he's been banged up. | ||||
BN | 0 | 0% (–) | 2079 | |||||
BN | 0 | 0% (–) | 2193 |
Fantasy | Rank | Matchup | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pos | Kickers | Action | Proj Pts | % Start Trend | Proj | Rating | Comment | |
K | 6 | 3% (–) | 267 | This offense is terrible and he has only 3 FGs over the last month. | ||||
BN | 8 | 5% (–) | 166 | Tied for 7th in fantasy points over the last four weeks so you can do worse. |
Fantasy | Rank | Matchup | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pos | Defense/Special Teams | Action | Proj Pts | % Start Trend | Proj | Rating | Comment | |
DEF | New York - DEF
| 15 | 37% (–) | 275 | Huge game last week and Romo is banged up so have some potential this week with DE Pierre-Paul. |
Fantasy | Rank | Matchup | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pos | Defensive Players | Action | Proj Pts | % Start Trend | Proj | Rating | Comment | |
D | 15 | 28% (–) | 1799 | |||||
D | 19 | 44% (–) | 379 | |||||
D | 12 | 12% (–) | 589 | |||||
D | 13 | 65% (-5) | 1263 | |||||
BN | 15 | 5% (-1) | 1548 |