Level | Rating | Percentiles | |
---|---|---|---|
Diamond | 900+ | 99th | |
Platinum | 800-899 | 95th-98th | |
Gold | 700-799 | 81st-94th | |
Silver | 600-699 | 60th-80th | |
Bronze | 0-599 | 0-59th |
Fantasy | Rank | Matchup | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pos | Offense | Action | Proj Pts | % Start Trend | Proj | Rating | Comment | |
QB | 26 | 75% (-1) | 17 | It would be nice if he had a healthy Jackson but at least he'll play the whole game and he did put up 274/2 against them a few weeks ago. | ||||
WR | 27 | 12% (+1) | 155 | Didn't get a target last week so forget it. | ||||
WR | 24 | 1% (–) | 2415 | |||||
WR | 2 | 0% (–) | 1823 | |||||
WR | 0 | 0% (–) | 2436 | Usually the odd man out here at WR. | ||||
RB | 10 | 2% (–) | 2284 | Only getting a handful of touches here and there. | ||||
RB | 0 | 0% (–) | 2504 | |||||
RB | 5 | 2% (–) | 240 | Probably not worth the reach unless McGahee has issues but he is still in the mix. | ||||
RB | 6 | 0% (–) | 2649 | |||||
TE | 7 | 88% (–) | 74 | Came up small against them a few weeks ago but the Giants do give up the 3rd-most FPG to the TE over the last five weeks. | ||||
TE | 0 | 0% (–) | 2401 | |||||
TE | 1 | 0% (–) | 1835 | |||||
W/R/T | 26 | 59% (–) | 95 | Made that huge play at the end to put up monster numbers against them earlier this year but we've got a QB mess so not exactly a must-start. | ||||
W/R/T | 5 | 4% (–) | 169 | He's clearly their top WR but tougher matchup against veteran secondary so hard to love him. | ||||
W/R/T | 4 | 1% (–) | 179 | He starts and a decent matchup but basically a non-factor here. | ||||
Q/W/R/T | 0 | 0% (–) | 2662 | |||||
Q/W/R/T | 11 | 0% (–) | 103 | Ram QB situation is up in the air but Bradford didn't practice early in the week, so it's probably Clemens again. | ||||
BN | 5 | 0% (–) | 2144 | |||||
BN | 0 | 4% (–) | 2683 |
Fantasy | Rank | Matchup | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pos | Kickers | Action | Proj Pts | % Start Trend | Proj | Rating | Comment | |
K | 8 | 40% (-1) | 167 | Always tough kicking in the Black Hole but the offense could stall in his range. |
Fantasy | Rank | Matchup | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pos | Defense/Special Teams | Action | Proj Pts | % Start Trend | Proj | Rating | Comment | |
DEF | Baltimore - DEF
| 15 | 91% (-1) | 280 | Dalton hasn't been a great matchup this year but they did intercept him 3 times a few weeks ago. |
Fantasy | Rank | Matchup | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pos | Defensive Players | Action | Proj Pts | % Start Trend | Proj | Rating | Comment | |
D | 26 | 12% (–) | 1708 | |||||
D | 26 | 36% (–) | 416 | |||||
D | 28 | 67% (-4) | 1577 | |||||
D | 27 | 38% (–) | 1720 | |||||
BN | 32 | 32% (+2) | 1792 | |||||
BN | 18 | 4% (–) | 327 |