Level | Rating | Percentiles | |
---|---|---|---|
Diamond | 900+ | 99th | |
Platinum | 800-899 | 95th-98th | |
Gold | 700-799 | 81st-94th | |
Silver | 600-699 | 60th-80th | |
Bronze | 0-599 | 0-59th |
Fantasy | Rank | Matchup | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pos | Offense | Action | Proj Pts | % Start Trend | Proj | Rating | Comment | |
QB | 23.39 | 79% (–) | 2 | Put up 28 FP against them earlier this year and has no playing time issues. | ||||
WR | 10.58 | 94% (–) | 69 | This is actually a very tough matchup for him so he could come up small but he is Larry Fitzgerald of course. | ||||
WR | 10.78 | 83% (-1) | 66 | We do have some playing-time issues with him and QB Rodgers so very shaky option. | ||||
RB | 23.15 | 74% (+1) | 26 | His injury seems fine this week and fully expected to play, so a must-start. | ||||
RB | 22.12 | 51% (+2) | 30 | Looked fantastic last week and the Pats have been run on this past month so keep using him. | ||||
TE | 15.44 | 94% (–) | 20 | Put up 109/2 against them earlier this year so start him. | ||||
W/T | 11.53 | 72% (–) | 50 | His history against Bailey is very spotty and he put up only 2/17 against them earlier this year but he is a go-to guy who is hard to sit. | ||||
W/R | 10.87 | 85% (-1) | 70 | Big disappointment last week but put up 79/1 against them earlier this year so start him. | ||||
Q/W/R/T | 22.14 | 95% (-1) | 3 | Still playing for #1 seed and Pats usually play their guys Week 17 plus put up 36 FP against them earlier this year. | ||||
BN | 9.50 | 90% (-6) | 144 | Mixed messages from GB about their plans but they have sat key players in meaningless games before so clear downside to using Rodgers. | ||||
BN | 12.20 | 66% (–) | 40 | The Bills do give up the most FPG to the TE over the last five weeks so a strong play. | ||||
BN | 17.18 | 44% (-1) | 51 | Role is up in the air as he's a game-time decisionp and Royster was good last week so shaky option. | ||||
BN | 10.70 | 85% (–) | 54 | Had a decent 5/54 against them earlier this year and nothing scary about the matchup. | ||||
BN | 0.00 | 5% (–) | 2625 | |||||
BN | 11.42 | 16% (–) | 44 | They should play to win with a 1 p.m. and he was excellent against them earlier this year with 274/2. | ||||
BN | 6.17 | 9% (-1) | 180 | Playing-time issues here in meaningless game so you can't use him. |
Fantasy | Rank | Matchup | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pos | Kickers | Action | Proj Pts | % Start Trend | Proj | Rating | Comment | |
K | 7.74 | 8% (–) | 193 | Offense has shown some life with Orlovsky and he has 8 FGs over his last four games. | ||||
K | 8.47 | 40% (-1) | 167 | Always tough kicking in the Black Hole but the offense could stall in his range. | ||||
BN | 7.39 | 5% (–) | 214 | Has just 1 FG over the last month so forget it. |
Fantasy | Rank | Matchup | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pos | Defense/Special Teams | Action | Proj Pts | % Start Trend | Proj | Rating | Comment | |
DEF | Green Bay - DEF
| 9.60 | 88% (-2) | 225 | Shaky play to say the least with nothing to play for but they did pick off Stafford 3 times earlier this year. | |||
BN | Los Angeles - DEF
| 9.60 | 17% (–) | 248 | Hard to rely on but the Raiders are giving up the 5th-most FPG to defenses over the last five weeks. |